Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wal-Mart CEO: It's Not Easy Being Green

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:52 AM
Original message
Wal-Mart CEO: It's Not Easy Being Green
from AlterNet's PEEK:



Wal-Mart CEO: It's Not Easy Being Green

Posted by ZP Heller, AlterNet at 8:46 PM on March 15, 2008.

There's no way Wal-Mart can fix the irreparable harm they've caused to our planet in such a short span of time, if ever.




Surprise, surprise! At this week's ECO:nomics conference in California, Wal-Mart CEO Lee Scott declared, "We are not green." This after the world's largest (and worst) retailer spent the last three years touting its environmental stewardship. Though Scott was unusually candid about Wal-Mart's inability to "green" themselves up, his admission only validates what many environmentalists already knew : There's no way Wal-Mart can fix the irreparable harm they've caused to our planet in such a short span of time, if ever.

Not too long ago, Scott pledged that Wal-Mart's massive "greenup on aisle five" would include investing $500 million in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, increasing truck-fuel efficiency, reducing packaging, and creating more energy-efficient stores. What's more, Scott vowed to pressure Wal-Mart's global suppliers to follow their new responsible lead. But could they really have zero waste? Or use 100 percent renewable energy?

These goals seemed so lofty that it didn't shock me when I read that Wal-Mart isn't green, or that Scott answered a question about when a complete green overhaul might happen by saying, "I have no idea when that will be." What I found particularly troubling though was when Scott started talking about what waste meant to him and the company. He was talking about bottled water. After pointing out the tragic irony that there was bottled water right there at the conference on environmental capital, Scott explained why Wal-Mart continues to sell bottled water , "We have to stay in business... If the customer wants bottled water, we're going to sell bottled water."

While Wal-Mart may be working to reduce their carbon footprint, it became clear that to Scott, reducing waste means making money, not fulfilling an environmental promise. "It really is about how you take cost out, which is waste," Scott concluded. Let's face it, Wal-Mart has engaged in greenwashing here and we've fallen for it, hoping that the world's largest retailer would miraculously grow a conscience. Instead, Wal-Mart has only distracted environmentalists from the company's woeful record while they pursue their bottom line--cutting costs and making profits. We should've known something was up when the NGOs that Wal-Mart looked to for advice on sustainability made the company guarantee anonymity so that these groups wouldn't jeopardize their enviro-credibility when things went south. .......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/79832/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. A corporation is a machine designed to maximize shareholder value
It simply cannot act altruistically. Not where altruism affects its bottom line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. However based on looking at the shelves the other day
they do appear to have cut back on their Chinese suppliers. I even found a couple of American made items.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. Oh course they're "green." They pay Amory Lovins boat loads of money.
This makes the "green."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diane in sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Your envy of Amory Lovin's reputation and success is pretty sad and obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It sounds like disgust to me
I know I don't have a lot of respect for the man. His reputation is a joke, IMO, because he is on the Walmart payroll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. My contempt for Amory Lovin's paid off ignorance is obvious. You have a bizarre interpretation
Edited on Tue Mar-18-08 11:07 PM by NNadir
of the word success.

If you define taking greenwashing payoffs from Walmart to produce this tripe:

http://www.walmartstores.com/GlobalWMStoresWeb/navigate.do?catg=348

don't expect me to be impressed.

Now, I see nothing in your little pat statements - not one of which is analytical in any sense of the word - that shows either a shred of comprehension of science or even a modicum of thought about the nature of this environmental catastrophe, but, even so, let me tell you something lady, hauling plastic shit from China to sell in car culture parking lots to satiate consumer lust ain't it.

I can smell a Tortilla Curtain "environmentalist" across a continent: Not guts, no brains, no sense, no decency, soaked with a very unpleasant whiff of diesel and gasoline.

In general Lovins defenders come in two stripes: They haven't actually read what he says or does and simply worship because they believe everything they hear on TV and read in fluff magazines, or they simply aren't too bright. It doesn't matter which is which.

Tripe.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diane in sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's probably not in the nature of a large corporation to be green, but if Walmart's trucks
use half the petroleum of their competitors and their stores use half the electricity, their competitors will have to follow suit to stay in business. This is an irresistible trend like the invention of the assembly line by Ford--all of his competitors and eventually most industries were forced to imitate to compete against his lower costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC