Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

French Nuclear Lemon Must not be Exported to US says Advocacy Group

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 07:47 AM
Original message
French Nuclear Lemon Must not be Exported to US says Advocacy Group
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 07:47 AM by bananas
The leaked letter pdf is at http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/france/press/reports/lettre-de-l-autorite-de-s-rete.pdf
It's dated March 12, 2008.
The French website is http://www.greenpeace.org/france/news/premieres-malfa-ons-sur-le-cha
Press release from Beyond Nuclear:

http://www.commondreams.org/news2008/0401-16.htm


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 1, 2008
4:12 PM
CONTACT: Beyond Nuclear
Linda Gunter, 301.270.2209 (o), 301.455.5655 (cl)

French Nuclear Lemon Must not be Exported to US says Advocacy Group

TACOMA PARK, MD - April 1 - The experimental French nuclear reactor – seven of which are potentially scheduled to be built in the U.S. – has already established a record of construction and safety flaws that could jeopardize public safety, new documents have revealed.

A letter from the French nuclear safety watchdog agency and leaked to Greenpeace France has revealed numerous technical errors and inconsistencies at the site of the first European Pressurized Reactor (EPR) to be built in France. The EPR – known as the “Evolutionary Pressurized Reactor” in the U.S. – is an untested, experimental design under construction at Flamanville, France and at Olkiluoto, Finland.

The Finnish reactor has already earned notoriety for technical failures, long delays and enormous cost-overruns.

The EPR is a product of Areva, the French nuclear giant that is more than 90 percent government-owned.

“It’s clear that the EPR is turning out to be a nuclear lemon,” said Linda Gunter of Beyond Nuclear. “These latest revelations confirm that the rush to expand nuclear energy is a risky enterprise beset by safety shortcuts and motivated by haste and profit.”

Beyond Nuclear recently released a scathing critique of the French nuclear industry, particularly the monumental radioactive waste problem created by its large nuclear energy infrastructure and polluting reprocessing programs.

“It’s time to call a halt to nuclear expansion plans in the U.S. and stem what could be a limitless tide of American taxpayer dollars flowing to the French government,” Gunter concluded.

Ironically, the latest EPR scandal was revealed just as French premier, Nicolas Sarkozy, was touting French nuclear technology to his British counterpart, U.K. prime minister, Gordon Brown. Together, the two leaders have made a pact - the "entente formidable" - to market nuclear energy around the world.

The problems in France mirror those that have occurred at the only other EPR construction site - at Olkiluoto in Finland - where delays, cost over-runs and similar technical mistakes with the concrete pour have set the project back at least two years. The Finnish cost over-run is currently estimated at $1.5 billion. Who ultimately pays the bill will likely be contested in court, but French taxpayers are expected to bear the brunt of the costs. In addition, Finnish electricity users will lose billions of Euros because of the delay.


Beyond Nuclear aims to educate and activate the public about the connections between nuclear power and nuclear weapons and the need to abandon both to safeguard our future. Beyond Nuclear advocates for an energy future that is sustainable, benign and democratic. Beyond Nuclear staff can be reached at: 301.270.2209. Or view our Web site at: www.beyondnuclear.org


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. "technical mistakes with the concrete pour" could have set back a coal fired plant,a gas fired plant
...or a municipal swimming pool project, for that matter.

In my observations, France has really not solved the waste disposal problem. They don't have vats of fuel rods in the front yards of the generating plants. It's been moved, but it is still somewhere and it is "hot".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. uranium is in short supply to,hear there's only 17 years of it left at present levels, its mining is
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 08:16 AM by sam sarrha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC