After 40 Years Of Gulf Of Mexico Dead Zones, Time For Yet Another Redraft Of Another Action Plan

[hatrack]

Last summer, a swath of Gulf of Mexico waters the size of New Jersey was virtually lifeless. For the past 40 years or so, dead zones have formed in the Gulf. Nutrients, mostly from farm fertilizers and other agricultural land use, run down the Mississippi River and feed huge algal blooms that choke off oxygen supplies. In 2001, after years of talk, federal and state agencies pledged for the first time to shrink the dead zone. But they have failed. Now, a second federal–state task force, led by the U.S. EPA, is in the final stages of revising the 2001 action plan, and many experts say this latest attempt at life support for the Gulf is likely to fail as well unless Congress approves new funding.

The new plan (PDF size: 553 KB), which is scheduled for release in June, maintains the goal of shrinking the dead zone to about one-quarter of last summer's size, or 5000 square kilometers, by 2015. However, it does not set targets for curtailing nutrient levels entering the Gulf. The 2001 plan (PDF size: 6.2 MB) recommended 30% cuts in nitrogen, and in 2007, EPA's science advisory board (PDF size: 4.8 MB) recommended tougher measures—45% cuts in both nitrogen and phosphorus. The new revision recognizes that 45% reductions "may be necessary" but does not set official goals.

"In some important ways, the plan not only doesn't advance the action, it slows it down," says Donald Boesch, president of the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science. According to the plan, states should complete new implementation strategies by 2013, he notes; this would allow only 2 years to achieve nutrient reductions before the 2015 deadline. "There are no serious timetables and no nutrient reduction goals, so if you're in an upriver state, how would you know what to do?" he asks.

The original action plan envisioned a coordinated effort across federal agencies with major new funding, but that never happened. Back in 2001, the task force's coordinating committee drafted a budget of $1 billion per year for 5 years to enact the action plan, but agencies never advanced that budget and funding prospects dried up in the Bush Administration. "No one expects to get that amount of money now. But even more modest investments would go a long way," says Doug Daigle, who coordinates a committee composed of states bordering the lower Mississippi River.

EDIT

http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/esthag-w/2008/apr/policy/ee_deadzone.html

[Botany]

1. Thanx for the post