Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House floats new climate proposal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 05:59 PM
Original message
White House floats new climate proposal
WASHINGTON (AP) — The White House has told a group of House GOP conservatives it may be forced to support a limited cap on greenhouse gases and avoid a "train wreck" of regulations involving climate change, sources familiar with the meeting said Monday.
A range of options presented at a meeting last week between senior White House officials and a group of Republican lawmakers was aimed at gauging the reaction to a possible shift of Bush administration policy on climate change.

"The meeting was set up to float a few trial balloons" and it did not go well, with some participants viewing it as "political appeasement" on global warming, said a GOP operative who was briefed on the meeting. He said, given the response, the White House may be retreating on the issue.


http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/environment/2008-04-14-white-house-climate_N.htm?csp=34
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. So...they're trying to make a pretense of doing something about climate change...
...and they're failing. Huh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. What the White House does
no longer matters. In 10 months, * will be gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mugweed Donating Member (939 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. ..and trade?
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 07:24 PM by Mugweed
do they leave out the "and trade" part on purpose? Or are they REALLY going to cap emissions instead of using a trade feature to concentrate emissions in the areas of the power plants that are just too "expensive" to upgrade pollution controls?
spelling, duh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC