Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Howard Woos Green Vote - Keep Logging Old Growth Indefinitely In Tasmania

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 09:34 AM
Original message
Howard Woos Green Vote - Keep Logging Old Growth Indefinitely In Tasmania
"Prime Minister John Howard, in a move hailed by the timber industry and condemned by environmentalists, yesterday vowed to allow logging of Tasmania's old-growth forests to proceed indefinitely at existing planned levels.

In his last big announcement before Saturday's election, Mr Howard said a re-elected Coalition government would preserve an extra 170,000 hectares of Tasmanian old-growth forest, while ensuring no job losses for timber workers.

The additional area for preservation under the Coalition was nominated on the advice of the timber industry, and consists mainly of areas not scheduled to be logged. It is significantly less than the 240,000 hectares that Labor has pledged to lock up, subject to review.

EDIT

Senator Brown said Mr Howard's policy was one for "appalling destruction" of forests and that Coalition voters would have chainsaws ringing in their ears when they voted on Saturday. "Two-thirds of Tasmania's iconic forests that could be protected will go to the chainsaws under John Howard," he said. Labor leader Mark Latham said Mr Howard had produced a "con-job" after saying earlier in the campaign he would stop old-growth logging. "As with the Kyoto Protocol, the Murray River and mandatory renewable energy targets, he has no commitment to the environment." Labor forestry spokesman Joel Fitzgibbon said Mr Howard's policy was a hoax. "It appears that at least 140,000 hectares of the forests John Howard claims he is saving already can't be logged under existing forest management," Mr Fitzgibbon said."

EDIT

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/10/06/1096949589167.html?oneclick=true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. where's a thylacine when you need one?
A confirmed sighting would be double sweet but I'm not gonna hold my breath.Everybody's got to believe in something.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. "keep old growth logging indefinitely"
Or until after five years all the old-growth forests are completely gone. Whichever comes first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC