Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gulf Times - Asian Refiners Push Back - Want Light Sweet, Saudis Offering More Heavy Sour

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 12:42 PM
Original message
Gulf Times - Asian Refiners Push Back - Want Light Sweet, Saudis Offering More Heavy Sour
SINGAPORE: Saudi Arabia may find itself unable to fully serve its crude oil customers in Asia, the most important market for Middle East producers, as refiners are reluctant to accept the grades being offered.

Asian refiners want increased supplies of the lighter grades of crude to produce more expensive cleaner-burning fuels while Saudi Arabia is offering more of the heavy, high-sulphur grades.

Despite a surprise announcement by Saudi Oil Minister Ali Naimi about three weeks ago that the kingdom had ramped up output by 300,000 bpd or more than 3% from May 10, none of the additional barrels are likely to have been loaded onto tankers bound for Asia.
It’s not that state-owned Saudi Arabian Oil Co, better known as Saudi Aramco, is holding back shipments.
“We haven’t asked for incremental cargoes so we don’t expect to be given any,” an official with a leading South Korean refiner said yesterday.
Late Wednesday, Saudi Aramco notified term customers in Asia, mostly Japanese and South Korean refiners, that it will supply full contracted crude oil volumes in July. Saudi Aramco is Asia’s top crude supplier and, like Iran and Kuwait, sells its cargoes only under term contracts. Refiners, however, aren’t keen to buy more of the high-sulphur or “sour” cargoes that make up the bulk of output from these producers, due to poor margins for fuel oil and heavy products.

EDIT

http://www.gulf-times.com/site/topics/article.asp?cu_no=2&item_no=224084&version=1&template_id=48&parent_id=28
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. There was a story yesterday about refineries at 88% capacity....
and the article treated it like a big mystery. I had been thinking that maybe the straightforward explanation is that most refineries are set up for light/sweet, and heavy/sour is becoming a bigger and bigger fraction of the available oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoseMead Donating Member (953 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Isn't this part of what's expected
with Peak Oil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes, decline in oil quality is part of the predicted scenario.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yes, it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Guess we know where the light sweet crude of the Dakota Bakken Field is headed..
..........."And unlike the tar from Canada's oil sands, Bakken crude needs little refining. Swirl some of it in a Mason jar and it leaves a thin, honey-colored film along the sides. It's light - -almost like gasoline -- and sweet, meaning it's low in sulfur.

Best of all, the Bakken could be huge. The U.S. Geological Survey's Leigh Price, a Denver geochemist who died of a heart attack in 2000, estimated that the Bakken might hold a whopping 413 billion barrels. If so, it would dwarf Saudi Arabia's Ghawar, the world's biggest field, which has produced about 55 billion barrels."
---------

Should bring a high bid on the foreign market, no matter the cost to the planet or the people who may suffer at the hands of this business.
Oilmen in the White House, setting policy, and ignoring the Constitutional 'law of the land'.
The needs of humanity are not even part of their equation.
THIS is what their world is all about.
It sets policy, declares war, and what falls away in its path to become the biggest player on the world market, is tragic for a moment befor the next group falls away and takes its place.

The way it is, in this day & age with oilmen in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Bakken is the fool's gold of the oil industry
Of the 400 billion potential barrels, modern technology can only extract 4 billion, per press releases over the past few months. 4 billion barrels, BTW, is only 55 days of world oil demand.

The field is a shale oil field, which is notoriously hard (ie expensive) to develop. The flow rate is pitiful compared to conventional oil fields, making it like trying to fill a pot from a dripping faucet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Light Sweet? LoL what planet are you from Asia?
That stuff is only going to be found in museums at this rate. The stuff they are getting now is getting more and more to the point many refineries just can't handle.

The drenching of the sweet crude has ended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC