Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What do you get when you combine sun, water, rust, and CO2? A: hydrocarbon fuel

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 09:07 AM
Original message
What do you get when you combine sun, water, rust, and CO2? A: hydrocarbon fuel
I think this is very interesting technology:

http://www.eetindia.co.in/ART_8800494913_1800008_NT_44459c35.HTM

In the hydrogen economy, automobiles would be powered by the simplest element on the periodic table, leveraging the element's abundance. But as the Hindenburg disaster demonstrated, hydrogen is the also most difficult element to compress into a safe, usable form. Why not instead synthesize a hydrocarbon-based fuel, such as methanol or even gasoline?

Sandia National Laboratories is building such a fuel synthesizer in a bid to harnesses sunlight to reverse the process of combustion. The reactor would use reclaimed carbon dioxide emissions to create renewable synthetic fuel by combining the CO2 with water.

"Rather than make hydrogen for people to use in fuel cells, we think it might make more sense to make a synthetic fuel that is already compatible with our existing infrastructure," said Rich Diver, inventor of the Counter Rotating Ring Receiver Reactor Recuperator (CR5). "Others are working on ways to make liquid synthetic fuels from natural gas, but we are going back a step further and looking at ways of thermochemically making the precursors for synthetic fuel using solar energy, carbon dioxide and water."

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Another Bill C. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. hydrogen did not bring down the Hindenburg
http://encarta.msn.com/sidebar_761595294/new_information_on_hindenburg_disaster.html

The varnish used on the covering caught fire, presumably from static electricity. Once the covering caught fire, the hydrogen burned. There was no explosion. The ship would have burned up even if an inert gas was used.

Ironically, the original plan was to use helium but the U.S. was the only source of helium at that time and refused to supply it for fear the Nazis would use it for military purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. For the evolution of this approach
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC