Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kyoto and CO2: The world's strangest market takes shape

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Quetzal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 04:53 AM
Original message
Kyoto and CO2: The world's strangest market takes shape
Kyoto and CO2: The world's strangest market takes shape

PARIS (AFP) - They trade in something that is colourless and odourless, cannot be tasted or felt. And whether they buy or sell, no merchandise will ever change hands.

But if all goes well, a decade from now these pioneers in the Kyoto Protocol (news - web sites)'s carbon market will be the commanding players in a business worth billions, possibly tens of billions, of dollars per year.

The market is one of three incentives under the UN pact aimed at easing the cost of reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) pollution, the main culprit for global warming.

Under Kyoto, 38 industrialised countries -- now 36, with the refusal of Australia and the United States to ratify it -- pledged to limit their output of greenhouse gases by a deadline of 2008-12.

more...

Kyoto and CO2: The world's strangest market takes shape
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Do not laugh Maine had some of this business,
Even the husband of Snowe was mixed up with it. One group of school children made some money and bought 'pollution stocks' and took them off the market. Works like this from what I could see and at first I did not believe it. Plant A pollutions is high so it goes over what the govt. tells it can do but plan B has little pollutions so Plant A buys Plant B pollution stocks and can keep pollution at the right number.Kids buying up some of the 'stock' takes the over all number down. Plant A can keep up it pollution and Plan B can not get into the market any more as Plant A has taken over. I just could not believe the whole thing but there were these kids on TV having bought the 'stocks' or chits. I do not recall how it was rated on who could do what but our Governor, Snow n's husband, got into it before she took him to DC for some nice paying job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceForever Donating Member (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-04 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's a brilliant idea, making it PROFITABLE to reduce environmental harm.
I really wish the idea of pollution credits would get more consideration from people. I know the idea originated with some free market academics, but that does not automatically make the idea bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
German-Lefty Donating Member (568 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It is a great idea, because it allows industry to optimize
If you have the choice between fixing up two plants, you can calculate which one will get the most bang for the buck.

Option A: cost 1M$ reduces CO2 X amount
Option B: cost 2M$ reduces CO2 3X amount

A good businessman will do option B first. This works a lot better than slapping down random fines, or doing what the law does now: "You have to use whatever technology is available to reduce pollution." What's "available" mean? Is shutting down the factory(and moving to Mexico) available? A market like this is generally a good idea if an industry can't get around polluting, but you slowly want to squeeze them into improving things.

There's this crazy guy in freeperland that totally believes in the stuff. He makes some good points, but is still a little out there. His basic idea is to sanction "process rights", so that everyone is allowed to keep doing what they're doing now. Environmentalists can then buy out the process rights, kind of like buying out farmers' water rights.

One really neat thing about markets like this is you can mix types of pollution. For example one industry can maybe produce a little bit more pollution in one area, in exchange for a lot less in another. Such a trade-off can be rewarded by the market. Government regulations and slapping down fines can't achieve something this complicated.

Market forces can work great to control pollution, but any market generates overhead and has to be legally protected too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC