Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Interior Warns Arizona Of Potential CAP Water Cuts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 10:42 AM
Original message
Interior Warns Arizona Of Potential CAP Water Cuts
GRAND CANYON - "The federal government's top water official urged Arizona leaders Sunday to work with other states to develop a drought plan for the Colorado River because not even the best scientists can say when this dry spell will end. Speaking to the opening session of Arizona Town Hall, Assistant Interior Secretary Bennett Raley said the states that use the Colorado must be prepared for a range of scenarios in the coming years and can't rely on any set of computer predictions.

"Our best modelers didn't predict the last five years of drought," Raley said. "Do not be deluded into thinking that models will tell you what will happen next year. Their crystal ball doesn't work."

More than 170 leaders from around the state are gathered here until Wednesday to discuss water issues and produce a set of recommendations that could help guide water policy in coming years. Drought and the Colorado River are among the key topics. Gov. Janet Napolitano is scheduled to address Town Hall delegates today.

Arizona and the other Colorado River states are trying to negotiate a set of rules that would spell out when a shortage would be declared on the river and how the shortfalls would be spread among the states.

Under existing law, if there is no other agreement in place and the Interior secretary were forced to declare a shortage on the river because of drought, the first taps to run dry would be those that feed the Central Arizona Project. That means billions of gallons of water that now flow to Phoenix and Tucson would instead remain in the river for Nevada and California."

EDIT

http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/1101water01.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Southpaw Bookworm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. A good thing?
I have to admit that I have little sympathy for those who think it's perfectly acceptable to expect a green oasis in the middle of the desert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Definitely good. The southwest states need to face up to
the inevitability of a prolonged drought. Even if this drought ends next year (unlikely), we will eventually endure a 20-year drought.

It also makes me very happy to hear somebody say "scientists don't know with certainty, so we had better act on the conservative side". The last twenty years or so it's been popular to say things more like "scientists don't know, so let's just assume everything is really just fine."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southpaw Bookworm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-04 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. OK.
I'm in the East, so I'm rather unschooled in the water rights issues of the Western U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yep...
The rise of Las Vegas has to be one of the stupidest developments in history...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC