Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UK Marine Biology Report From DEFRA Shows 70%+ Decline In Zooplankton Since 1960s - BBC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 12:47 PM
Original message
UK Marine Biology Report From DEFRA Shows 70%+ Decline In Zooplankton Since 1960s - BBC
Experts on invertebrates have expressed "profound shock" over a government report showing a decline in zooplankton of more than 70% since the 1960s. The tiny animals are an important food for fish, mammals and crustaceans.

Figures contained in the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) document, Marine Programme Plan, suggested a fall in abundance. Charity Buglife said it could be a "biodiversity disaster of enormous proportions".

They said it could have implications for creatures all the way up the food chain, from sand eels to the seabirds, such as puffin, which feed on the fish.

EDIT

Buglife director Matt Shardlow has written to Rodney Anderson, director of marine and fisheries at Defra, praising the level of information in the document but also expressing the organisation's serious concerns. In his letter, seen by the BBC Scotland news website, Mr Shardlow said: "The disappearance of butterflies, moth, bees, riverflies and other small animals is an environmental tragedy. "But, despite this experience, we were profoundly shocked to read that zooplankton abundance has declined by about 73% since 1960 and about 50% since 1990. "This is a biodiversity disaster of enormous proportions."

EDIT

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/uk_news/scotland/highlands_and_islands/7499834.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe WALL-E is right, we should abandon Earth
May have to anyway. Where's that interstellar cruise ship?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Well, Americans already have a headstart on the morbid obesity of the future humans
After I saw that movie, my girlfriend and I went for a walk around the Mall of America. It made me notice things I had just taken for granted in the past. Quite the eye opener.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. I was afraid of this. I'm glad I don't have children.
We have, in our hubris, precipitated another Permian-level extinction, I suspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Oh, I don't know...
...in ten years time, you might be glad of the extra protein.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Just the foundation of the food chain. What could go wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes, the ghost of Julian Simon spoke to me in a dream last night
He said that we have enough energy and resources to keep human population growing at 3% annually for the next seven million years.

See? Problem solved!!! All you need is a little Lysenko-, uh, I mean, all you need is some elbow grease, some all-American can-do optimism and an ideologically ingrained ability to overlook pretty much all rules of physics and thermodynamics.

Is this a great country or WHAT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oops.
Surely, nobody could have foreseen that.

Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. Where were these measurements made?
Is this a local phenomenon or global? The article gives no clue. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. If the report was from Defra...
...it would be specific to UK coastal waters and/or fishing grounds, although the problem is global: put "zooplankton decline" into google for instant depression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC