Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Missing brackets blamed in Vermont (Yankee) nuke mishap

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 04:43 PM
Original message
Missing brackets blamed in Vermont (Yankee) nuke mishap
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/07/16/ap5221135.html

The Vermont Yankee nuclear plant remained at less than half its normal power output Tuesday as state and federal regulators zeroed in on missing brackets on support beams as the cause of a new round of problems with the plant's cooling towers.

A top official with the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission, director of operations William Borchardt, traveled from Washington to meet Tuesday with Entergy Corp. (nyse: ETR - news - people )-owned plant and state officials and participate in a conference call with Vermont's three congressional offices.

Borchardt told reporters after that meeting that a cooling tower leak discovered last Friday resulted from an inadequate fix to a much bigger leak that struck one of the towers' 22 sections, or cells, last August.

<snip>

Vermont Yankee operates under strict limits on the temperatures of water it can return to the river - the limits are designed to protect fish and other aquatic life. It uses the cooling towers in summer to help it meet the river temperature limits. With the cooling towers out of operation since Friday - plant spokesman Robert Williams said one row of 11 was ready to return to service as of Tuesday - the plant had to reduce its flows, which in turn forced it to reduce power.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, yeah -- now we know how to run nukes, so we should build more.
No chance at all of messing up hundreds of square miles of the environment for thousands of years.

Safe, safe, safe -- and, oh so reliable!

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC