Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lights Out?: How the Grid Copes When a Nuclear Power Plant Goes Down

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 04:49 PM
Original message
Lights Out?: How the Grid Copes When a Nuclear Power Plant Goes Down
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=how-the-grid-copes-when-nuclear-power-plant-goes-down

Last Friday at 11 A.M., the operators of the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant in Vernon, Vt., detected a leak. About 60 gallons (225 liters) of water a minute was escaping from the eastern cooling tower of the 620-megawatt power plant that provides nearly three quarters of the state's electricity needs. By noon, the owners had shut down both the damaged and undamaged cooling towers and had cut the plant's electricity output in half to avoid any harm to the reactor. By Monday, the plant was operating at 23 percent capacity because of limits on the amount of water it could use from the Connecticut River to cool its nuclear core.

But Vermont electric consumers barely noticed—though they might feel it later in their wallets. Despite the shutdown of the state's major power plant, lights, TVs and life's other electrical amenities continued to operate as usual. How is that possible? The company that operates the state's power grid has a contingency plan in case of emergency shutdowns, says Dorothy Schnure, a spokesperson for Green Mountain Power, one of two local utilities that purchase and resell much of the power from Vermont Yankee.

ISO New England, Inc., the independent system operator that ensures juice is flowing in Vermont and the rest of New England, always has spare power sources—courtesy of fossil fuel–fired, so-called "peakers" (units that provide power to the grid only during peak demand)—to compensate if power plants or transmission lines go on the fritz, according Erin O'Brien, an ISO spokeswoman.

Rob Williams, a spokesperson for Entergy Vermont Yankee, the power company that runs the 35-year-old nuclear facility, says it should be back at full capacity by the end of the week, pending a safety inspection by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The leak was caused by a sagging bracket supporting a cooling pipe in the eastern tower. The problem is worrisome because the bracket—a piece of metal that bolts a support beam in place—was relatively new: All of the brackets in the two towers, which are made of wood, had been replaced after a similar cooling pipe collapse in the western tower last August. The brackets are now being replaced with a new, stronger design, Williams says.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Some "peakers" are
jet engines. At least that's what an engineer at Progress Energy told me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Are we hearing from a wind energy advocate about the capacity utilization of Vermont Yankee?
In the annals of selective attention, this is a classic.

In fact, Vermont Yankee despite the efforts of fundamentalists to shut it and dump dangerous fossil fuel waste into the lungs of people all over the Northeast has produced more energy in the last year than all of the wind plants in New England and all of the solar plants in New England combined.

It has made Vermont the state with the cleanest electricity in the Northeast.

I have covered the situation with respect to Vermont's electrical external costs in a diary that is over the head of the entire anti-science anti-nuke cult:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/1/8/185552/4950">Um, My Compact Fluorescent Bulb Is Hot. (Places and Times NOT to Conserve Electricity.)

I note, with due contempt, that the "renewables will save us" cults couldn't care less how many people die from dangerous fossil fuels burned when the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining, even considering the decades long period in which the non-hydro renewable industry has failed miserably to produce a single exajoule of electricity in the United States, going on nearly half a century of disingenuous talk.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Howzit Donating Member (918 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 03:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I enjoy your writing style on KOS, but wonder about
Edited on Thu Jul-17-08 04:25 AM by Howzit
that one mile you drove to buy the CFL because it was cold out. Almost certainly your Civic did not yield 33 MPG on such a short trip in the cold. It would be running rich until warmed up, and when it is cold out, this could take longer than the whole trip, there and back.

Your point about incandescent light bulbs being a primary source of heat for single rooms is something that many people completely overlook - some talk about banning incandescents because they don't see why anyone needs them. Homes with central heating would needlessly heat the whole house when a single bulb is enough to "take the edge off" in a small room.

That said, I think people who choose to live in parts of the country that require forced heating in Winter and cooling in Summer should be taxed and that money given to residents where the climate is moderate, such as San Diego. We have taxes and incentives to discourage other forms of energy use and to encourage energy saving, so why not extend this to the location people choose to live and work?

Likewise, people make a flap about one's vehicle choice based on MPG, but don't cut you any slack if you have made other choices that reduce your driving needs to less than 5000 miles a year. However, any credit one might get for such low annual mileage should automatically evaporate if your trips are less than 5 miles...

(I am just trying to show how easy it is to make up laws "to save the planet" that seem to make some sense to some people, while hurting others; such as banning incandescent bulbs).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hooray! More CO2 was released into the atmosphere!
"always has spare power sources—courtesy of fossil fuel–fired, so-called "peakers""
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Ahh, no, you see...
...when fossil fuels are used as a backup, the CO2 spontaneously turns into flowers, bunnies, and really cute kittens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Howzit Donating Member (918 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. The same way solar copes when the sun goes down
Edited on Thu Jul-17-08 04:00 AM by Howzit
You rely on other sources and/or storage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Precisely the point ...
... which, when taken with the lack of significant storage on the grid,
shows why solar PV is only a *small* piece of the solution as it requires
"other sources" every night. This means that fossil fuels are burned,
nuclear has to be retained (despite complaints), wind & hydro be relied
upon (despite being somewhat intermittent) and the gods of wishful thinking
to be prayed to (in the dark).

The best way to use the sun is to heat your water with it: you can start at
a very low cost (low tech) level and increase efficiency as your budget allows
yet every bit of help from the sun is reducing demand for fossil fuel and
nuclear energy whilst allowing the other renewables to go that bit further
than otherwise.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC