Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nuclear power decreased by 3.6% in OECD countries last year.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 04:20 AM
Original message
Nuclear power decreased by 3.6% in OECD countries last year.
"Nuclear power plants provided 21.6% of the electricity generated in OECD countries, as compared to 22.9% in 2006."
"Total nuclear electricity production was 2172 TWh in 2007, about 3.6% less than the previous year."

http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/News/2008/npoecd.html

Mixed Picture for Nuclear Power in OECD Countries
Staff Report
17 July 2008

The picture is mixed for nuclear power in the world´s higher income countries, which collectively account for 85% of the world´s nuclear-generated electricity. While some countries produced record amounts of nuclear electricity last year, nuclear´s share of overall electricity production dipped slightly.

The update comes from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency (OECD/NEA) based in Paris, France. The latest figures are reported in the NEA´s Nuclear Energy Data for 2008:

Nuclear power plants provided 21.6% of the electricity generated in OECD countries, as compared to 22.9% in 2006. This was despite record production at nuclear power plants in Finland, Hungary and the United States, which did not offset reduced output in France, Germany and Japan and plant closures in the Slovak Republic and the United Kingdom. Total nuclear electricity production was 2172 TWh in 2007, about 3.6% less than the previous year.

<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder what's replacing it
The article doesn't hint if it's renewables, nat. gas, or coal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. maybe conservation is part of it
I know that we've been keenly aware of every joule that we use these last few years. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC