Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ontario nuclear plant weld failure "unprecedented," documents show

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 04:03 PM
Original message
Ontario nuclear plant weld failure "unprecedented," documents show
http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=5b689d87-3396-4dc7-ba50-5276d4d7005c

OTTAWA -- When the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission was struggling last December with a shortage of medical isotopes sparked by the Chalk River reactor shutdown, it was also dealing with another Ontario nuclear plant where there had been an "unprecedented" weld failure on one fuel bundle.

In all, 10 defective welds were found on the fuel bundle, a collection of processed uranium rods resembling the barrel of a Gatling gun about a half-metre long.

The rods contain pellets of uranium dioxide - used to generate electricity by heating water into steam to drive turbines.

The defective bundle was discovered at the Bruce Power plant, north of Tiverton, Ont., in June 2007.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is the wave of the future, as Dick "Dick" Cheney attempts to FAST-TRACK n-plants
Cheney feels that on-site construction inspections are too onerous for the poor constructions companies, and that all new N-plants should receive fast-track approval. Meaning, NO INSPECTIONS until AFTER the plant is completed. Of course, you can bury a billion bad welds under a billion tons of concrete, and no one will see them. Until it's too late.

For Mr. Cheney, as always, personal profit trumps the safety of the planet every day of the week.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. I can't wait until we have hundreds more of them myself
I've come to the conclusion that we need to build as many of them as we possibly can, safety and money be damned. Maybe after a while everything will be glowing so as we won't even need lights at night anymore, just think how much money that would save, health be damned though. Hell we could reproduce at a much faster rate than we do now so no one would hardly notice that the life expectency is horid as they'll be so many to move up into their spaces, yessiree an endless supply of humans to cater to the have alls. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. You forgot this part
""Based on measurements of radiation levels, many of these welds did not fail until after the bundle was removed from the reactor," he said. "It is not unusual for the temperature change involved in removal to cause poor welds to completely fail.""

The unprecedented weld failures happened AFTER the fuel was loaded and run through the reactor, with no discernible effect on reactor function or safety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks for pointing that out (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC