Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

List of sites for possible nuclear waste recycling facilities scrapped

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 04:07 PM
Original message
List of sites for possible nuclear waste recycling facilities scrapped
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-argonne-nuke-recycling_both_jul26,0,774313.story

In February of 2007, the U.S. Department of Energy stirred controversy by announcing it was considering recycling nuclear waste and building facilities at Argonne National Laboratory and on a site near Morris to aid in the effort.

Now, the Department of Energy is stepping back, announcing it is not considering any sites for the facilities. The department still is examining the feasibility of reprocessing nuclear waste. "One way of looking at this," department spokesman Brian Quirke said Friday, "is that Argonne used to be on the list. Now the list doesn't exist."

Called the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership, the program was proposed by President George W. Bush in January 2006. The idea, Bush and supporters said, was to expand the use of nuclear reactors to generate electricity all over the world. Advocates contend the program would offset rising oil and natural gas prices while lowering emissions.

But critics said the program, known as GNEP, would require more storage and shipping of radioactive material, increasing the potential for nuclear mishaps. GNEP also would make it easier for terrorists to acquire nuclear weapons materials, detractors said.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. The most important recommendation in MIT's 2003 report "The Future of Nuclear Power"
Edited on Sun Jul-27-08 04:35 PM by bananas
"Thus our most important recommendation is:
For the next decades, government and industry in the U.S. and elsewhere
should give priority to the deployment of the once-through fuel cycle,
rather than the development of more expensive closed fuel cycle
technology involving reprocessing and new advanced thermal or fast
reactor technologies."

Chapter 1 — The Future of Nuclear Power — Overview and Conclusions
Page 5.
http://web.mit.edu/nuclearpower/


edit to add: GNEP is a scam, Yucca Mountain is a money-pit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC