Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Microcosm: Chesterfield CO (VA) C Of C Votes Unanimously Against Cutting Phosphorous Runoff

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 12:29 PM
Original message
Microcosm: Chesterfield CO (VA) C Of C Votes Unanimously Against Cutting Phosphorous Runoff
Edited on Wed Jul-30-08 12:30 PM by hatrack
The Chesterfield County Chamber of Commerce's board of directors has voted unanimously against lowering the amount of phosphorous runoff to .16 pounds per acre per year from new development in the Upper Swift Creek Plan (USCP) area. The board of supervisors will hold a public hearing on lowering the limit next week. With 625 members, the chamber is the largest business organization in Chesterfield.

The current phosphorus standard is .22 pounds for residential properties and .45 pounds for commercial. The .16 standard is considered to be what would occur naturally without any development. "There is no valid scientific evidence that more strict phosphorous requirements will have an impact on water quality," said Neal Lappe, the chamber's chairman. "The stricter standard would have a devastating impact on business development."

ED. - emphasis added.

"After considering both sides, it was clear that the .16 standard has no scientific support and is both arbitrary and capricious," added former Chairman Sam Kaufman, one of the 11 chamber board members who voted to oppose the measure. "It's an impossible standard to meet and not geared toward any sound environmental policy." Both the Chesterfield Planning Commission and the county's Environmental Engineering Department also oppose the .16 standard.

The development community has also been meeting, including private property owners who fear their property rights are being denied. They and the business community believe the tougher standard is being promoted by Matoaca Supervisor Marleen Durfee to fulfill a campaign pledge. In an email, Durfee wrote she has not taken a position yet. "I don't think it's appropriate to shut down all development in the watershed," said Dan Gecker, vice chairman of the board of supervisors.

EDIT

http://www.chesterfieldobserver.com/news/2008/0723/home/002.html

As I've said, Americans will do whatever it takes to protect the enviroment, provided it doesn't cost them any money or inconvenience them in any way at all. And this is exactly how it plays out where you - and I - live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC