Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Power Plant Wants To Build 2,000 Feet Underground (1 GW pumped storage, Maine)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 05:20 PM
Original message
Power Plant Wants To Build 2,000 Feet Underground (1 GW pumped storage, Maine)
http://www.wcsh6.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=93255

WISCASSET (NEWS CENTER) -- A Canadian company wants to build a $2 billion power plant in Wiscasset 2,000 feet underground. The huge and unique proposal was outlined to the town's planning board Monday night, and so far, town officials say they're very interested.

Wiscasset has electric transmission lines and a big industrial switching station left over from Maine Yankee. Wiscasset also has available industrial land next door, as well as water. A company from Toronto called River Bank Power wants to use that water to generate a thousand megawatts of electricity.

They plan to do this by digging a series of shafts or channels 2,000 feet straight down through bedrock. They would then have turbines at the bottom and river water would pour down the shafts and generate power. Water would be stored in gigantic chambers, and then pumped back to the surface at night, when electric usage is much lower.

Wiscasset town planner Jeff Hinderliter says Riverbank Power was received well at the planning board meeting. He says there are a lot of questions that will need to be answered, but for now, the project looks promising. He also says it would finally bring good development to land that used to be owned by Maine Yankee.

<more>

on edt: just what the doctor ordered to manage the 1000-2000 MW of wind and tidal power under development in the state...

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting concept; borrowing power instead of storing it.
They extract energy during the day and use off peak generated energy to pay it back AFTER.

Another article about the same company doing it on the St. Lawrence River: http://www.watertowndailytimes.com/article/20080509/NEWS05/714511733

Not sure what the benefits are as opposed to pumping it first as storage for spilled energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hmmm what happens to the fish and whatnot?
Freshwater smoothie? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. This was on the local 6 o'clock news. It uses recycled water.
The developers propose to excavate multiple 2000 foot vertical head shafts that power underground turbines. The turbines spill into large-volume underground chambers that would store the water used to generate electricity during peak demand periods.

Water in the underground storage chambers would then be pumped back to surface reservoirs during off peak periods.

etc.

No need to chew up the fishies...

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Nice :D n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Not so sure of that...
The St. Lawrence article says the draw is enough to affect the river's water level. That is a lot of water to build two separate storage systems for...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oh really? The second law of thermodynamics doesn't apply in Maine?
Basically when you scratch the surface of an anti-nuke you see someone who can't tell the difference betweeen energy storage and energy creation.

Maine doesn't even produce the energy it needs in situ from wind or solar. It's a gas kingdom with it's ass on the line when Sable Island goes dry, which it will.

http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/st_profiles/sept05me.xls

We'll just pile this with all the other wishful thinking that's blathered here for the last six years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Storage: another nail in nuclear energy's casket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Exactly where are people missing that this isn't a power plant?
It says in the title that it's about storing energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Boo Freakin' Hoo Hoo and LOL
Edited on Wed Sep-24-08 09:38 AM by jpak
Maine generates 47% of its electricity from wood biomass and conventional hydro...more than any other state.

~8,200,000 MWh per year

http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/solar.renewables/page/state_profiles/maine.html

Maine is a NET EXPORTER of electricity

16,816,173 MWh total annual production

12,284,768 MWh per annum in-state sales

If Maine withdrew from ISO New England and had to "go it alone" it could satisfy 67% of its in-state demand from renewables - TODAY.

More than any other state - including Nuclear-New-Jersey-Which-Is-A-Fraud.

The EIA figures do not include electricity generated from THe 42 MW Mars Hill wind farm.

There are >1000 MW of new on-shore wind capacity under development in Maine with an additional 3000 MW in potential off-shore wind capacity.

There are ~300 MW of tidal power capacity under development in Maine.

Maine utilities are upgrading the state's electrical grid in anticipation of these developments.

This large pumped storage facility - like the one under development in Spain - would manage power output from those new renewable assets and do it economically.

In a few short years, Maine will be able to satisfy ALL of its electrical demand from renewable sources - and do it reliably.

Too bad for you and your NEI cronies.

DIRIGO

:rofl:







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Oh yeah - only a pro-nuclear dumbass would claim that the 2nd Law
allows for energy CREATION...

sick fuck pro-nucular fundy creationist nonsense

I hope those NEI crooks didn't pay a whole lot for that lunch they bought you.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElectricGrid Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. What are you talking about?
this is storage.. not creation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. I've begun to design a "gravity battery" for my windmills, this is a very good concept.
Good old reliable gravity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I wanted to put my house on a hoist
my wife didn't care for the idea....

Using what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. The land I'm looking at has a lot of huge rocks.
I was thinking of using strong steel cabling and just hoisting it up with energy from the windmills, then as it falls back down (when there's not enough power in the system to maintain the drain) it returns the kenetic energy.

This is the good thing about being a bachelor. ;) No one will care if I have a couple of big ass windmills and a big barn with a big container of rocks hanging from the ceiling!

I'll definitely be posting more about it as soon as the land agreement happens and I start building. It's all super-preliminary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Consider pushing it up instead of pulling it up.
An inexpensive automobile lift is often gear driven instead of hydraulic. Soon you will probably be able to buy a Hummer and park it on the lift and use it as dead weight.

If you do this I'd love to hear about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Two options I considered were flywheel driven or gear driven.
Both would require gears but a flywheel reduces the complexity of the system. But I want the system to last 50 years or more with maintainance, and I think a flywheel is going to need replacing every few years or so.

I don't think, though this is just guessing, that an automobile lift would have the proper gear ratio, much less be able to hold a significant amount of kenetic energy. I want at least enough power to last 10 days without wind (though the land I'm looking at rarely has days like that).

But cute with the Hummer idea. They should be worth more in metal in due time. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC