Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Yet Another Problem At Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 09:50 AM
Original message
Yet Another Problem At Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant
The ailing nuclear power plant in Vermont, whose license is due to expire soon, experienced yet another safety issue on Thursday. The plant is nearing the end of its designed lifetime, and Vermont legislators are have to vote this year to renew the license for another 20 years past it's design.




Vermont Yankee finds leak, reduces power

VERNON -- The Vermont Yankee nuclear plant reduced power production by 60 percent Thursday after finding a leak of radioactive water in a pipe that supplies water for steam generation in the reactor.

It was the second leak discovered in the nuclear power plant's water system in the past few weeks. Wednesday, the plant announced it could repair a water leak in a different section of the plant without reducing power.

Plant spokesman Rob Williams said the leak discovered by a technician Thursday was more pressing than the earlier leak.

http://burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20090109/NEWS02/901090309

(note, the photo above is not from this week's problem... just another water leak that happend 2 years ago... nothing to worry about here!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. That is quite a leak in the photo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. yah, and the only reason we know about that is because of a whistleblower
we can only guess how many other leaks we don't know about. the plant is literally falling apart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I had an argument a dinner awhile ago about Nuclear Power
Respectable people were brainwashed that plants are safe and they were really adamant that we HAVE to start building plants again...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. they're wrong. you're right.
does that help?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. Self fulfilling prophecy
It's like having a car that won't pass an upcoming state inspection. Why spend money on maintenance of something that is going to be scrapped anyway.

As long as the plant higher ups think the licence won't be renewed. Maitenance will be intended only to limp the plant to the shutdown date. In turn there will be more incidents like this which will have bandaids placed on them to limp along a couple more months. When someone finally demands they either repair it properly or shut down the facility. Then the operators will likely close it down.

Reminds me of watching a train wreck.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. wouldn't bother me.
whatever it takes to shut it down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. What happens if they extend the permit
Wouldn't that promote spending on maint?

If the plant can safely be operated for another 20 years, it would be best to delay decommissioning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think so too
at least it isn't here in my back yard :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Uncertainty is the real culprit
Wether it be building alternative energy projects or deciding what to do with an ageing nuke.

Limping along so you can continue operation *IF* you should get a permit extension but not spending any money on maintenance because you probably won't is not a place we should want to be.

I think there is little incremental damage associated with letting the plant continue for another 20 years. Or at the very least to adequate alternative sources have been brought on line. But the decision of Not making a decision is almost always bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC