Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Montana Utility Bags Coal Plant Plan, Will Go With Combo Of NG And Wind - Billings Gazette

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:40 PM
Original message
Montana Utility Bags Coal Plant Plan, Will Go With Combo Of NG And Wind - Billings Gazette
Blaming regulatory uncertainty and environmental lawsuits, developers of the Highwood Generating Station near Great Falls are halting work on the planned coal-fired generating plant for now and are going to build one powered by natural gas with wind turbines for additional power.

In a unanimous vote Friday, board members of four south-central Montana cooperatives decided to switch directions in order to get a 120-megawat natural-gas-fired plant up and operating by 2011 to provide electricity for members.

Lawsuits and regulatory delays over coal have delayed the project too long, said Tim Gregori, chief executive of Southern Montana Electric and Transmission Cooperative in Billings, the parent organization formed to provide wholesale electricity to its member co-ops.

"We have been studying relative economical wind and natural gas from the beginning of the project back into 2003. Even though wind and gas isn’t a cheaper economic alternative, it’s a pragmatic solution," he said.

EDIT

http://www.billingsgazette.net/articles/2009/02/02/news/state/20-highwood.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow, Montana is Coal Country. Good for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Unfortunately, the headline is misleading
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 02:20 PM by OKIsItJustMe
They'd planned to go with a 250MW coal plant and a token 6MW of wind. Instead, they're going with a 120MW gas plant and the same token 6MW of wind.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=115&topic_id=185207&mesg_id=185207
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And here I thought hell had frozen over...
Guess not...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC