Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Californica facing worst drought in modern history

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
sfpcjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 09:32 AM
Original message
Californica facing worst drought in modern history
Edited on Wed Feb-04-09 09:33 AM by sfpcjock
...so thank you Buschmuck/Cheney's Law for kissing Exxon's ass for 8 years. You MOROONS! Only problem I can see here is that the forests begin to die after a few years of this :D

Calif. facing worst drought in modern history

ECHO SUMMIT, Calif. (AP) — State officials reported a Sierra Nevada snowpack smaller than normal on Thursday and said California may be at the beginning of its worst drought in modern history. Residents were immediately urged to conserve water.


Terry Cochrane, caretaker of the Lake Pillsbury Resort in Northern California, stands on the dock Thursday. During a normal wet year, the water would be approximately 30 to 40 feet deep at the dock.

The snowpack was about 61% of its usual depth across the 400-mile-long mountain range, according to the state Department of Water Resources, which released the findings as part of the second snow survey of the season.

Department Director Lester Snow said the results indicate California could be heading for a third dry year.

"We may be at the start of the worst California drought in modern history," Snow said in a statement. "It's imperative for Californians to conserve water immediately at home and in their businesses."



Measurements of snow depth and snow water content in the Sierra are important because they help hydrologists forecast how much water California can expect to get in the coming year.

<...>

And in neighboring Nevada, the U.S. Agriculture Department has declared almost all of the state a natural disaster area because of losses caused by drought over the past year.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. to many people in the semi-arid portion of the state
best start now before people have to abandon the southern part of the state
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Can you read a map?
Note well that the EXTREME drought area is in the northern part of the state. (And yes, for those of you playing along at home, that's where I'm at.)

We usually get as much rain in the winter as Seattle, and we've got many very large rivers.

So which part of the state do you suggest we abandon again? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Coastal town of Bolinas limits use to 150 gallons a day -- or else
San Francisco Chronicle, 2-4-09:

With California in a critical drought, every shower, load of laundry and glass of tap water counts. But only in Bolinas could those things cost you your water connection.

The oceanside enclave in Marin County has enacted some of the state's toughest water restrictions. Each customer - with the exception of schools and some businesses - may use no more than 150 gallons a day, about 4,500 gallons each month.

A third violation of the order would allow the Bolinas Community Public Utility District to cut off water.

Without drastic cutbacks, officials say, the community of 1,200 could run out of water by the end of April. The town on the southern end of the Point Reyes Peninsula already is drawing from two emergency reservoirs, one of which is effectively empty.

LINK: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/02/04/MNV415MGLA.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfpcjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Wow. Haven't been out there for a few years
Obviously they cannot get what's left of the Sacto river water that far west so must rely on rainfall and ground water sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Every time I think the biggest tools in the state are in Redding
I read the SFGate comments section and I am reminded that they are everywhere. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC