Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

100 Levees In 16 States Have Failed To Pass Inspections In Past 2 Years

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 01:35 PM
Original message
100 Levees In 16 States Have Failed To Pass Inspections In Past 2 Years
WASHINGTON — More than 100 levees in 16 states have flunked maintenance inspections in the past two years and are so neglected that they could fail to stem a major flood, Army Corps of Engineers records show. The 114 levees received "unacceptable" maintenance ratings in corps inspections, meaning their deficiencies are so severe that it can be "reasonably foreseen" that they will not perform properly in heavy flooding, according to the records, which were requested by USA TODAY.

As a result, the corps is advising state and local levee authorities that the levees no longer qualify for federal rehabilitation aid if damaged by floodwaters.

People who rely on the levees should "be aware that there is reason for concern," says Tammy Conforti, head of the corps' levee safety program. The corps built most of the levees and turned them over to state and local governments, which were supposed to maintain them. Some of the neglected levees protect urban, residential areas, such as the Arcade Creek levee in Sacramento; others guard rural or agricultural land.

The corps' levee inspections were revamped under a public safety initiative started after Hurricane Katrina in 2005. A round of 63 levees with unacceptable maintenance lost eligibility for federal rehabilitation aid last year after they were not fixed within a one-time, one-year grace period. Now, the addition of 114 levees to that list leaves a total of 177 nationwide that are so poorly maintained that they don't qualify for federal rehabilitation. That's 9% of the nearly 2,000 levees the corps inspects.

EDIT

http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20090224/1alevy24_st.art.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Something about this story makes me think "shovel ready."
But I'm an America-hating socialist who voted for B. Hussein Obama.

If I were a true patriot like Bobby Jindal, I would instead continue to slash taxes, fuck those levies, and declare American Capitalist Victory!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. we have volcaneos too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And all those pesky ol' volcanoes need is MORE TAX CUTS!!!!
There, wasn't that more fun than thinking??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Personaly, sitting near Yellowstone, I think hurricane monitoring is $ poorly spent...
Not really. I am capable of big picture concepts ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Sitting near Lassen and Shasta
money spent on tornado research is money thrown in the garbage. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC