Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wildlife managers to resume removing California sea lions at Bonneville Dam, Washington State

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 03:38 PM
Original message
Wildlife managers to resume removing California sea lions at Bonneville Dam, Washington State



WDFW NEWS RELEASE
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife

OLYMPIA - Wildlife managers from Washington and Oregon will resume efforts next week to remove California sea lions that prey on federally protected salmon and steelhead in the Columbia River.

That effort, initiated last year, is intended to protect threatened and endangered fish runs from a growing number of California sea lions. The sea lions feed on spring chinook and steelhead below Bonneville Dam as the fish attempt to navigate the dam’s fish ladders to spawn upriver.

According to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 103 sea lions last year consumed 4,243 salmon and steelhead-the highest number on record-in a quarter-mile area immediately below the dam.

Since January, state and federal biologists have been using underwater firecrackers, rubber buckshot and other non-lethal deterrents to "haze" sea lions away from fish-primarily sturgeon-congregated below the dam.

Next week, wildlife managers will resume removing specific California sea lions under authority granted to Washington, Oregon and Idaho last year by NOAA-Fisheries, the federal agency responsible for managing marine mammals. That authority allows the three states to use lethal or non-lethal means to remove individual California sea lions that have been documented feeding on salmon or steelhead below Bonneville Dam.

Like last year, the states’ first priority will be to place those animals in federally approved zoos and aquariums, said Guy Norman, southwest regional manager for the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). The states also have the authority to use lethal measures, if necessary, to remove California sea lions that meet the federal criteria.

"As natural-resource managers, we have a responsibility-in instances where a man-made structure has disrupted the natural predator-prey relationship-to do what we can to restore that balance," said Phil Anderson, WDFW interim director.

"In this case, the prey are fish populations listed for protection under the federal Endangered Species Act, and our response is critical to recovery of these fish populations."

The removal of specific sea lion predators from the Columbia River will not affect the overall sea lion population, biologists say. California sea lion numbers have grown rapidly since the 1970s and the species is now at "carrying capacity"-near the highest level the environment can sustain-according to wildlife biologists. The U.S. population of California sea lions is estimated at some 300,000 animals, all on the Pacific coast. A population survey conducted in 2006 by WDFW documented 1,200 California sea lions near the mouth of the Columbia River alone.

An interagency Animal Care Committee will oversee the removal operation.

Last year, state wildlife managers relocated six California sea lions to SeaWorld facilities in Orlando, Florida and San Antonio, Texas, where the animals are all reported to be in good health. However, relocation efforts were suspended after six other sea lions died of heat prostration in cage traps. An investigation by NOAA-Fisheries found that the cage doors dropped shut behind the animals while the traps were unattended, but did not determine why the doors closed.

This year, wildlife managers are taking additional precautions to ensure the cage traps function properly, said Robin Brown, marine mammal program leader for the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW). Under one new protocol, the trap doors will be locked open to prevent them from closing when the traps are unattended, he said. In addition, the doors to the traps have been fitted with magnetic locks that require a code to open.

For more information about sea lion predation at Bonneville Dam, see the WDFW website at

http://wdfw.wa.gov/wlm/sealions/index.htm


(How awful, they are going to kill these animals. I am sure there is more to this story than blaming the sea lions for the predation on salmon).





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Mixed feelings here. The CA Sea Lion population has rebounded, is at sustainable levels.
Though they are at no fault, of course, for taking advantage of a man made situation (the dam and the fish ladders) they will decimate the salmon and steelhead populations. An O'Henry situation of our own making.

I note they say "specific" sea lions. I wonder what the criteria is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Habitual feeders that return to the dam
At least that's what the criteria used to be. If they can scare them back to the ocean or more open parts of the river, they'll live them alone. They don't like them feeding right at the dam because it's not natural for the sea lions either. They need to be out in their normal habitat.

This is definitely a tough one. Just makes me sad to hear about them being killed too. Some fishermen just don't care at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. These guys must have been pretty hungry to swim that far upstream.
Sea Lions usually stick to the saltwater. Bonneville dam isn't anywhere near the coast.

So the real question should be.... why is the fish supply on the coast really so bad that it forces hungry sea lions to swim 100 miles upstream to look for dinner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Which is being addressed too
It's a mess, no question. Logging, dams, dead zones in the ocean, the kill-off on the Klamath, commercial fishing to some extent, lots of things have contributed to a collapse of the salmon population. The whole situation is awful. And yet we still have people up here who deny that there environmental problems that we have to deal with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Aren't they a valuable source
of lamp oil, or mukluks? How about cat food?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC