Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nanopillars Promise Cheap, Efficient, Flexible Solar Cells

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 04:18 PM
Original message
Nanopillars Promise Cheap, Efficient, Flexible Solar Cells
http://newscenter.lbl.gov/press-releases/2009/07/09/nanopillar-solar-cells/">Nanopillars Promise Cheap, Efficient, Flexible Solar Cells

BERKELEY, CA – Researchers at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the University of California at Berkeley have demonstrated a way to fabricate efficient solar cells from low-cost and flexible materials. The new design grows optically active semiconductors in arrays of nanoscale pillars, each a single crystal, with dimensions measured in billionths of a meter.

“To take advantage of abundant solar energy we have to find ways to mass-produce efficient photovoltaics,” says Ali Javey, a faculty scientist in Berkeley Lab’s Materials Sciences Division and a professor of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley. “Single-crystalline semiconductors offer a lot of promise, but standard ways of making them aren’t economical.”

A solar cell’s basic job is to convert light energy into charge-carrying electrons and “holes” (the absence of an electron), which flow to electrodes to produce a current. Unlike a typical two-dimensional solar cell, a nanopillar array offers much more surface for collecting light. Computer simulations have indicated that, compared to flat surfaces, nanopillar semiconductor arrays should be more sensitive to light, have a greatly enhanced ability to separate electrons from holes, and be a more efficient collector of these charge carriers.

http://newscenter.lbl.gov/press-releases/2009/07/09/nanopillar-solar-cells/">There's more ...

Conversion efficiency was 6% on the first try. The fly in the ointment, as usual in the leading edge of PV technology, is the requirement for cadmium. What that they could "persuade" more abundant, less toxic metals to act the same way!

--d!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. I still snore at "breakthroughs."
Until and unless you can demonstrate it working outside a lab, you don't really have a viable technology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlecBGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. me too
I used to get excited. Its been years now and still we dont have the panels that are "just around the corner." When a full-scale, profitible enterprise gets going, then Ill celebrate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlecBGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. yeah, saw that
it IS good news. its just hard to get excited when we see atmospheric CO2 hitting 393 ppm and our congresscritters cant seem to summon the cojones to really address the problem in an effective manner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. "then I'll celebrate"
Those are your words.

Now go have a few relaxing moments with your favorite beverage and savor a meaningful moment and try to flush some of that sourness from your system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlecBGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. lol
Edited on Sun Jul-12-09 09:10 AM by AlecBGreen
I think Ill have a cup of coffee to wash down the crow. :toast: to Solyndra
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Not only does it need to work outside a lab
Edited on Sat Jul-11-09 06:11 PM by Massacure
There are a lot of technologies that work outside a lab that can be considered nonviable. Cost is usually the main issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. How
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC