Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Study Sheds Light on the Growing U.S. Wind Power Market

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 03:11 PM
Original message
New Study Sheds Light on the Growing U.S. Wind Power Market
http://newscenter.lbl.gov/press-releases/2009/07/16/new-wind-power-market/

July 16, 2009

New Study Sheds Light on the Growing U.S. Wind Power Market

Contacts: Allan Chen (510) 486-4210, a_chen@lbl.gov, (public information)

Ryan Wiser (510) 486-5474 , rhwiser@lbl.gov (technical contact)

Berkeley, California — For the fourth consecutive year, the U.S. was home to the fastest-growing wind power market in the world in 2008, according to a report released by the U.S. Department of Energy and prepared by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab). Specifically, U.S. wind power capacity additions increased by 60 percent in 2008, representing a $16 billion investment in new wind projects. “At this pace, wind is on a path to becoming a significant contributor to the U.S. power mix,” notes report author Ryan Wiser, of Berkeley Lab. Wind projects accounted for 42% of all new electric generating capacity added in the U.S. in 2008, and wind now delivers nearly 2% of the nation’s electricity supply.

The 2008 edition of the “Wind Technologies Market Report” provides a comprehensive overview of developments in the rapidly evolving U.S. wind power market. The need for such a report has become apparent in the past few years, as the wind power industry has entered an era of unprecedented growth, both globally and in the United States. At the same time, the last year has been one of upheaval, with the global financial crisis impacting near-term growth prospects for the wind industry, and with federal policy changes enacted to push the industry towards continued aggressive expansion. “With the market evolving at such a rapid pace, keeping up with trends in the marketplace has become increasingly difficult,” notes report co-author Mark Bolinger. “Yet, the need for timely, objective information on the industry and its progress has never been greater…this report seeks to fill that need.”

Drawing from a variety of sources, this report analyzes trends in wind power capacity growth, turbine size, turbine prices, installed project costs, project performance, wind power prices, and how wind prices compare to the price of conventional generation. It also describes developer consolidation trends, current ownership and financing structures, and trends among major wind power purchasers. Finally, the report examines other factors impacting the domestic wind power market, including grid integration, transmission issues, and policy drivers. The report concludes with a preview of possible near- to medium-term market developments.

Some of the key findings from the just-released 2008 edition include:
  • The U.S. is the fastest-growing wind market worldwide. The U.S. has led the world in new wind capacity for four straight years, and overtook Germany to take the lead in cumulative wind capacity installations.
  • Growth is distributed across much of the U.S. Texas leads the nation with 7,118 MW of new wind capacity, but 13 states had more than 500 MW of wind capacity as of the end of 2008, with seven topping 1,000 MW, and three topping 2,000 MW. Over 10% of the electricity generation in Iowa and Minnesota now comes from wind power.
  • Market growth is spurring manufacturing investments in the U.S. Several major foreign wind turbine manufacturers either opened or announced new U.S. wind turbine manufacturing plants in 2008. Likewise, new and existing U.S.-based manufacturers either initiated or scaled-up production. The number of utility-scale wind turbine manufacturers assembling turbines in the U.S. increased from just one in 2004 (GE) to five in 2008 (GE, Gamesa, Clipper, Acciona, CTC/DeWind).
  • Wind turbine prices and installed project costs continued to increase into 2008. Near the end of 2008 and into 2009, however, turbine prices have weakened in response to reduced demand for wind due to the financial crisis.
  • Wind project performance has improved over time, but has leveled off in recent years. The longer-term improvement in project performance has been driven in part by taller towers and larger rotors, enhanced project siting, and technological advancements.
  • Wind remained economically competitive in 2008. Despite rising project costs, in recent years wind has consistently been priced at or below the price of conventional electricity, as reflected in wholesale power prices. With wholesale prices plummeting in recent months, however, the economic position of wind in the near-term has become more challenging.
  • Expectations are for a slower year in 2009, in large part due to the global recession. Projections among industry prognosticators range from 4,400 MW to 6,800 MW of wind likely to be installed in the U.S. in 2009. After a slower 2009, most predictions show market resurgence in 2010 and continuing for the immediate future.


Berkeley Lab’s contributions to this report were funded by the Wind & Hydropower Technologies Program, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy of the U.S. Department of Energy.

Berkeley Lab is a U.S. Department of Energy national laboratory located in Berkeley, California. It conducts unclassified scientific research for DOE’s Office of Science and is managed by the University of California. Visit our website at http://www.lbl.gov.

Additional Information:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why did someone unrec this? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. I like seeing the wind turbines
I see many of the blades and towers come through here on big ass trucks, wish some of them were stopping here as we could use some.
rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. If it's growing so fast, how come the Vestas Oil, Gas and Wind company is laying people off?
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/04/vestas-wind-turbine-cut-1900-jobs-recession-uk-denmark.php

In fact, the largest growing form of electrical generation is not even close to being wind power. On the contrary, the largest growing form of electrical generation is the industry that the "bait and switch" wind energy industry exists to serve: The dangerous natural gas industry.

The biggest supporters of wind are all owned, lock, stock and barrel by dangerous fossil fuel companies, and Vestas says as much, baldly, right in their vision statment.

http://www.vestas.com/en/about-vestas/strategy/vision.aspx

If wind is so great, how come California is adding 12,334 MW of new dangerous natural gas capacity this year, even though there is NOT ONE person in the "wind will save us" community - from Amory Lovins to the Gazprom executive Gerhard Schroeder to the moral moron Joe Romm who has the slightest idea of how to permanently dispose of dangerous natural gas waste for eternity?

http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epa/epat2p4.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angryfirelord Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Simple really
Because at some point, fossil fuels will run out. Therefore, these companies want a backup plan when that happens and they have the funds to invest in this technology. But in the meantime, they also know that demand is going to go up, so the search for natural gas continues. Burning natural gas is a far better choice than burning coal.

No need to bring in the conspiracy theorist, just standard economics at work. The job cuts are mostly out in Europe, not in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FREEWILL56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Really, you don't say. Forgive me, but.......
Explain the permanent enmass layoffs at SWWP (Southwest Wind Power), who is one of the major wind power products manufacturers, and the fact that their operations are going to China after ripping off many customers with bad or poor performing products? Small scale wind hasn't anything reliable out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. small scale wind is usually a scam...
The technology requires economy of scale for it to be economical.

I'm pretty sure the OP is focused on the successful growth of large scale wind as a contributor to our energy needs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. It's right there in the OP
  • Expectations are for a slower year in 2009, in large part due to the global recession. Projections among industry prognosticators range from 4,400 MW to 6,800 MW of wind likely to be installed in the U.S. in 2009. After a slower 2009, most predictions show market resurgence in 2010 and continuing for the immediate future.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Unfortunately, wind is still only supplying one third of one percent of US energy consumption.
http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/alternate/page/renew_energy_consump/table1.html

Fossil fuels and nuclear supply 94%, with conventional hydro adding another 2% or so. Wind electricity has a long way to go to if it wants to make a dent in fossil fuel consumption: if it can maintain 25% annual growth for 20 years it will be supplying a bit less than a quarter of the energy that fossil fuels do today.

We'd better be doing some serious downsizing at the same time to make it all come out right. I figure if we cut vehicle miles traveled in half and cut industrial production by a third we should be able to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
excess_3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
9. please send some wind to Texas .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC