Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DOE Provides Funding for Superconductor Smart Grid Projects

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 03:45 PM
Original message
DOE Provides Funding for Superconductor Smart Grid Projects
Edited on Wed Jul-29-09 03:47 PM by bananas
July 21, 2009

U.S. Department of Energy Provides Funding for Superconductor Smart Grid Projects

American Superconductor to Receive $12 Million Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act for Ongoing Superconductor Power Cable and Fault Current Limiter Projects

DEVENS, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--American Superconductor Corporation, a global energy technologies company, today announced that the United States Department of Energy (DOE) has provided more than $12 million in funding to AMSC under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to complete the following ongoing superconductor smart grid projects:

* AMSC is receiving $4.8 million in additional funding to develop a three-phase 138 kilovolt (kV) fault current limiter (FCL) using the company’s 344 superconductors. This FCL will feature a proprietary Siemens-developed, low-inductance coil technology that makes the FCL invisible to the grid until it switches to a resistive state. AMSC is serving as project manager and wire supplier. The team also includes Southern California Edison, Siemens AG, Nexans and Los Alamos National Laboratory. In total, the DOE is providing nearly $8 million in funding for this project.
* AMSC is receiving $7.6 million in additional funding for the second phase of its superconductor power cable project with Long Island Power Authority (LIPA). This will be a transmission voltage (138kV) extension of the superconductor cable system that was commissioned in LIPA’s grid in April 2008. The extension utilizes AMSC’s second generation (2G) high temperature superconductor (HTS) wire, branded as 344 superconductors. AMSC is serving as project manager and wire supplier, Nexans is the cable manufacturer and Air Liquide Advanced Technologies U.S. LLC is providing the cryogenics system. In total, the DOE is providing more than $12 million for this project.

“The Long Island Power Authority, the first utility in the world to commission an HTS power transmission cable system, commends the Department of Energy for funding Phase II of this critical project, which will allow us to expand the existing transmission line demonstration project to connect between two major substations on Long Island,” said LIPA President and CEO Kevin S. Law. “Superconducting cables are a key ingredient in advancing smart grid technology that will help us fulfill our objective of continuing to provide safe, reliable, and efficient service to our customers. This award is the next step in demonstrating the value of superconductivity and we look forward to our continued work with American Superconductor and DOE on this important project.”

AMSC’s awards were part of a $47 million “smart grid demonstration” package announced yesterday by the DOE. According to the DOE announcement, “The $47 million in Recovery Act awards announced today will support existing projects that are advancing demonstration-scale smart grid technologies which will play an important role in modernizing the country’s electricity grid.” In addition to the $12 million in funding for AMSC’s projects, an additional $8 million was awarded to another superconductor fault current limiter project.

“The Obama Administration has placed a high priority on smart grid technologies that enhance the efficiency and resiliency of our expanding power infrastructure,” said Dan McGahn, Senior Vice President and General Manager of AMSC Superconductors. “This bodes well for the superconductor industry in general and American Superconductor in particular. Our DOE-funded programs will enable us to once again demonstrate the compelling power density and security advantages afforded by superconductor power cables and fault current limiters. We expect there will be a substantial global market opportunity for these smart grid technologies in the next decade.”

<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Question:
Is it wise to build our grid with objects that cease to function at temperatures above liquid nitrogen? I can see how such devices might have really attractive performance properties, but overall it doesn't make me think "robust grid."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Answer: yes
Nothing works 100% of the time, even regular transmission lines fail on a regular basis.
Squirrel chews and overgrown tree limbs are particularly dangerous.

Frankly, that seems like an odd question from a pro-nuke.
It's not wise to build a grid with objects that create large National Sacrifice Areas:
Depending on circumstances, the Station Blackout reactor accident scenario can be particularly dangerous to public health and safety. The reactor core can melt on time scales comparable to the TMI accident. Unlike the limited loss of cooling event at TMI, however, the core damage scenario in a Station Blackout can be particularly severe, including a so-called “early high energy release” comprising a particularly heavy “portfolio” of fission products dispersed far and wide within a few hours.

http://www.energypulse.net/centers/article/article_display.cfm?a_id=514

Squirrels cause more blackouts than lightning strikes:
Suicide squirrels driving utilities nuts
By Alan Gomez, USA TODAY

Every year, Neil Engelman carefully collects his data, stands before his company's board of directors and is asked the same question: What caused more outages? The lightning or the squirrels?

Four of the past five years, the answer has been the squirrels, says Engelman, vice president of operations for the Lincoln Electric System in Nebraska. Nebraska is not alone. Many states are grappling with a big increase in the number of power outages caused by squirrel electrocutions.

Squirrels that fry themselves on power lines and transformers cause tens of thousands of blackouts every year.

Some states have seen a massive jump in recent years in the number of such outages. In Georgia, squirrel-related outages more than tripled from 5,273 in 2005 to 16,750 in 2006.

<snip>

The entire west coast was blacked out in 1996 because of a tree:
Blackout of 1996

On August 10, 1996, during a period of high temperatures and high demand for electricity, a major transmission line failure knocked out power to 4 million people in eight West Coast states. The impacts were immediate and, in areas such as the San Francisco Bay area, they lasted for hours. For the most part, the major power outage was just a major inconvenience. Planes continued to land and take off at the city’s airport, but the electrically operated jetways were grounded. Traffic lights winked out, and gridlocks ensued. Chefs at the famous Hays Street Grill in San Francisco set up barbecues in the alley in back of the restaurant, and elsewhere there were sudden markdowns of refrigerated foods.

The cause of the chaos? At 3:42 p.m., a power line sagged into filbert trees near Hillsboro, Oregon, just southwest of Portland. It was the fourth power line in Oregon to fail in less than two hours. Five minutes later, at 3:47 p.m., a line shorted out in Vancouver, Washington, across the Columbia River from the Portland/Hillsboro area. At 3:48 p.m., the 13 turbines at McNary Dam, on the Columbia about 190 miles upstream from Portland, quit operating. The combination of the power outages and the temporary loss of McNary triggered a cascade of power outages as far away as southern California.

<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes, lots of strange things can bring down a grid.
Would liquid-nitrogren-dependent devices become yet another one?

Seriously, I don't claim to know. Maybe these devices result in a net risk decrease. I just have this intuitive reaction that having substations depend on heavy duty refrigeration equipment and being bathed in liquid N2 is not a recipe for maximum risk reduction.

It doesn't bother me that they're looking into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fledermaus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Most MRIs are cryogenicly cooled to 4 Kelvin. It's not that new anymore, but you mabe right.
It's another level of complexity. Sort of like 3 Mile island. Too many levels of complexity. No body realy new what was going on untill it was almost too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Frankly, that seems like an odd answer from such an "enthusiastic" anti-nuke
> Nothing works 100% of the time, even regular transmission lines fail
> on a regular basis.

... with the implication that this is fine ...?

Funny how double standards work isn't it?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Get real. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Get consistent. nt
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
excess_3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 05:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Answer: No, we have enough problem and uncertainty
we don't need more by going cheap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC