Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MIT: Methane gas likely spewing into the oceans through vents in sea floor (…at a much faster rate…)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 11:48 AM
Original message
MIT: Methane gas likely spewing into the oceans through vents in sea floor (…at a much faster rate…)
http://cee.mit.edu/news/releases/2009/methanehydrates

Methane gas likely spewing into the oceans through vents in sea floor

September 2, 2009

By Denise Brehm
Civil & Environmental Engineering

Scientists worry that rising global temperatures accompanied by melting permafrost in arctic regions will initiate the release of underground methane into the atmosphere. Once released, that methane gas would speed up global warming by trapping the Earth’s heat radiation about 20 times more efficiently than does the better-known greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide.

An MIT paper appearing in the Journal of Geophysical Research online Aug. 29 elucidates how this underground methane in frozen regions would escape and also concludes that methane trapped under the ocean may already be escaping through vents in the sea floor at a much faster rate than previously believed. Some scientists have associated the release, both gradual and fast, of subsurface ocean methane with climate change of the past and future.

“The sediment conditions under which this mechanism for gas migration dominates, such as when you have a very fine-grained mud, are pervasive in much of the ocean as well as in some permafrost regions,” said lead author Ruben Juanes, the ARCO Assistant Professor in Energy Studies in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.

“This indicates that we may be greatly underestimating the methane fluxes presently occurring in the ocean and from underground into Earth’s atmosphere,” said Juanes. “This could have implications for our understanding of the Earth’s carbon cycle and global warming.”

Juanes explains that some of the naturally occurring underground methane exists not as gas but as methane hydrate. In the hydrate phase, a methane gas molecule is locked inside a crystalline cage of frozen water molecules. These hydrates exist in a layer of underground rock or oceanic sediments called the hydrate stability zone or HSZ. Methane hydrates will remain stable as long as the external pressure remains high and the temperature low. Beneath the hydrate stability zone, where the temperatures are higher, methane is found primarily in the gas phase mixed with water and sediment.

But the stability of the hydrate stability zone is climate-dependent.

If atmospheric temperatures rise, the hydrate stability zone will shift upward, leaving in its stead a layer of methane gas that has been freed from the hydrate cages. Pressure in that new layer of free gas would build, forcing the gas to shoot up through the HSZ to the surface through existing veins and new fractures in the sediment. A grain-scale computational model developed by Juanes and recent MIT graduate Antone Jain indicates that the gas would tend to open up cornflake-shaped fractures in the sediment, and would flow quickly enough that it could not be trapped into icy hydrate cages en route.

“Previous studies did not take into account the strong interaction between the gas-water surface tension and the sediment mechanics. Our model explains recent experiments of sediment fracturing during gas flow, and predicts that large amounts of free methane gas can bypass the HSZ,” said Juanes.

Using their model, as well as seismic data and core samples from a hydrate-bearing area of ocean floor (Hydrate Ridge, off the coast of Oregon), Juanes and Jain found that methane gas is very likely spewing out of vents in the sea floor at flow rates up to 1 million times faster than if it were migrating as a dissolved substance in water making its way through the oceanic sediment — a process previously thought to dominate methane transport.

“Our model provides a physical explanation for the recent striking discovery by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of a plume 1,400 meters high at the seafloor off the Northern California Margin,” said Juanes. This plume, which was recorded for five minutes before disappearing, is believed not to be hydrothermal vent, but a plume of methane gas bubbles coated with methane hydrate.

The Jain and Juanes paper in the Journal of Geophysical Research also explains the short-term consequences of injecting carbon dioxide into the ocean’s subsurface, a method proposed by some researchers for reducing atmospheric greenhouse gas. Juanes found that while some of the CO2 would remain trapped as a hydrate, much would likely spew up through fractures just as methane does.

“It is important to keep both methane and carbon dioxide either in the pipeline or underground, because the consequences of escape can be quite dangerous over time,” said Juanes.

This research was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. This sounds like it might be potentially "frackin'" bad!
Edited on Wed Sep-02-09 01:12 PM by cascadiance
Pardon the Battlestar Galactica pun, but I wonder if the natural gas companies' methodology of drilling down and "hydraulic fracturing" of shale that the EPA just released a study on that looks to prove that it causes methane and other contaminants to be leaked into the water tables and people's water supplies in places where this is done.

I haven't heard if they are also doing this in the oceans as well, but it would seem if what is being shown here is true, then that should be stopped if they are doing so.

Just this week an EPA report was released that appears to confirm local residents' concerns and complaints about this "hydraulic fracturing" contaminating their water supply with things like methane, etc.

http://www.gjsentinel.com/hp/content/news/stories/2009/08/30/083109_3a_EPA_and_EnCana.html

EPA finds contaminated water possibly linked to Wyming wells

By DENNIS WEBB/The Grand Junction Daily Sentinel

Sunday, August 30, 2009

Area oil and gas industry critics are praising the Environmental Protection Agency for tests that discovered drinking water contaminants were possibly connected to drilling-related activities in Wyoming.

Among other findings, the EPA tentatively identified a substance, 2-butoxyethanol, or 2-BE, that also had been used to fracture a Silt-area well.

The Colorado well had been the subject of a state investigation concluding methane from gas development had gotten into the well.

The well’s owner at the time, Laura Amos, developed a rare adrenal cancer, a possible health effect of exposure to 2-BE.

However, the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission has maintained there never was evidence of fracturing fluids in her drinking water.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No, I don't think this is a result of drilling for "Natural Gas" (AKA "Methane")
This is simply a matter of physics. If hydrates are warmed, or depressurized, they will release methane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why is it I knew this in 1983 and have sat and watched no one deal with this in an aggressive way?
People are stupid and selfish. At what point are the wealthiest who control the ability to deal with this going to figure out that if you are dead, it will not matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I don't know of a way to deal with hydrates "in an agressive way."
Unless you want to dig them up and burn them (reasoning that CO2 is better than CH4.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC