Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Inorganic Mercury Detected In 30% Of US Women In 2005-6 Study - Had Been 2% In 1999 - ENS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 12:17 PM
Original message
Inorganic Mercury Detected In 30% Of US Women In 2005-6 Study - Had Been 2% In 1999 - ENS
Edited on Wed Sep-02-09 12:17 PM by hatrack
LOS ANGELES, California, September 1, 2009 (ENS) – The level of inorganic mercury in the blood of American women has been increasing since 1999 and it is now found in the blood of one in three women, according to a new analysis of government data for more than 6,000 American women.

"My study found compelling evidence that inorganic mercury deposition within the human body is a cumulative process, increasing with age and overall in the population over time," said author Dan Laks, a neuroscience researcher at the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles.

In a separate statistical analysis, he found that older women had more inorganic mercury in their blood than younger women, indicating that mercury accumulates in the blood over time. "My findings also suggest a rise in risks for disease associated with mercury over time," Laks said.

Laks conducted computer analyses of data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta. The CDC's National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, usually called NHANES, is what Laks calls the "gold standard" in assessing the health status and health risks to a representative group of Americans. NHANES is unique in that it combines interviews and physical examinations.

EDIT

http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/sep2009/2009-09-01-092.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. where is the increase of mercury coming from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't know bout you, but I love snacking on those
mercury filled thermometers when I'm having cravings for toxic substances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Coal fired powerplants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Tuna?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. But that would show up as methyl mercury, wouldn't it?
Not enough chemistry knowledge to do more than embarrass myself . . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Well, methyl mercury is the most common environmental form of mercury. Mercurous medications
were widely used in the late 17th through the early 20th century, and one of them, calomel, was, for a long time, the only treatment for syphilis.

Calomel is "inorganic" mercury strictly speaking, but ingesting it is not usually fatal.

Calomel is an extremely insoluble compound but it is mercurous chloride, which is mercury in the +1 oxidation state, aka Hg(I). Actually this ion is a dimer, and the ion is Hg2+2. Under the right conditions, mercurous Hg(I) can disproportionate, with the mercurous chloride disproportionating into the free metal and the very, very, very, very, very, very toxic Hg+2 ion a monomeric species. This ion parent ion found in the most common mercury ore, cinnabar, used since antiquity as an orange pigment, sometimes in tableware. This is HgS, a very insoluble compound, and the mineral form of most of the mercury on earth. (Ironically another comment orange pigment, used until the mid 20th century was an oxide of uranium.) When "roasted" in air, cinnabar reacts to give metallic mercury, which was known since antiquity as "quicksilver."

Mercury metal is not particularly toxic, except as the vapor, since a way to keep mercury reduced to the mercurous state is to keep it in the presence of the metal. It is safe enough that many barometers have been used in laboratories around the world without too much toxicity observed. Thus one can eat mercury metal and often not experience overall immediate toxic symptoms, since much will be excreted as calomel. However, over a long period of time, some Hg+2 is formed by oxidation of the metal, which accounts for the fact that mad hatters did not immediately go mad as soon as the took the job, but did go mad after decades of work.

The toxicity of mercury is, in fact, related to its affinity for sulfur. It forms irreversible complexes with certain chemicals involved in the Krebs cycle that are important for the catalysis of the oxidation of sugars. A similar effect accounts for the toxicity of cadmium, of solar cell fame, which has very similar chemistry to mercury and forms toxic thiolate complexes in living systems.

Since nerve cells are the most dependent on access to sugar metabolism and oxidation, the toxicity of mercury and cadmium is observed in these cells before other cells, although mercury is toxic to all cells, not just nerve cells.

Mercury also bonds with proteins containing cysteine, often replacing physiologically important magnesium, zinc and copper complexes and inactivating the proteins. Methyl mercury also works in this way.

Environmental sources of mercury are dominated by (roughly in this order): coal, medical and scientific devices, and sewage. The latter source is derived from slow leaching, often as calomel or other halides, from dental amalgams. Although the calomel leachate is usually not especially toxic, once it is passed into the environment, the calomel can and does oxidize to the toxic state.

There has been much discussion of replacing dental amalgams with synthetic polymers of various types, some of which are inorganic polymers.

Mercury is dangerous fossil fuel waste. Scrubbing mercury from smokestacks simply creates a mercury disposal problem. Mercury has no half-life. It stays toxic forever. There are no permanent mercury repositories that are known to be safe for billions of years. I once proposed a chemical idea for one, but I was more or less joking, although there is no reason to assume it wouldn't work: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/1/3/152128/3838">Radioactive Isotopes from French Commercial Nuclear Fuel Found In Mississippi River.

Interestingly enough, the presence of heavy metals in sewage resulted in the prevention of corrosion in sewer systems in previous times, particularly when it was legal to dump mercury, lead, and other toxic heavy metal solutions into sewer systems. The malodorous condition of sewage is connected to toxic hydrogen sulfide, which often precipitated mercury in septic systems forming synthetic minerals like cinnabar. (Ore quality deposits often form near sewage outfall pipes in oceans and rivers.) (Iron, copper, lead, zinc and other elements also do this.) The reduction in heavy metal pollution in sewers allowed more sulfur to remain unbonded, whereupon it slowly oxidized to sulfuric acid, causing the accelerated corrosion of metal and concrete pipes.

I am not sure what is being referred to in this accounts as "inorganic mercury." Cinnabar and calomel are not all that toxic, although they certainly qualify as "inorganic mercury."

The acidification of the atmosphere is certainly causing mercury to oxidize more readily than would otherwise be the case. Mercury metal dissolves in common acids to give the +2 ion, although HCl can result under some conditions in passivated mercury with a thin layer of insoluble calomel protecting it from further oxidation. There are lots of common acids around in the environment, particularly nitric acid, which easily oxidizes mercury, and sulfuric acid.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Thank you - interesting!
IIRC, Minamata Disease was methyl mercury-based, caused by accumulation in shellfish and (to a lesser degree) fish - but that obviously doesn't seem to be what they've been screening for here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. My pleasure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Dupe
Edited on Wed Sep-02-09 02:10 PM by hatrack
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Tuna, thanks to Coal fired power plants, "chlor-alkali" plants and automobile recyclers
Edited on Wed Sep-02-09 05:21 PM by OKIsItJustMe
http://www.nrdc.org/health/effects/mercury/sources.asp

Know Where It's Coming From

Each year power plants and chemical facilities create many tons of mercury pollution, which makes its way into our homes and bodies in fish.

Two of the biggest sources of mercury pollution are chlorine chemical plants and coal-fired power plants. Chlorine plants, which use massive quantities of mercury to extract chlorine from salt, "lose" dozens of tons of mercury each year; power plants emit around 50 tons of mercury pollution annually. Facilities that recycle auto scrap are another big source of mercury pollution, pouring 10 to 12 tons of mercury into the air every year. The most common way Americans are exposed to mercury is through tuna fish.

Power Plants

Coal is naturally contaminated with mercury, and when it is burned to generate electricity, mercury is released into the air through the smokestacks. The bulk of this mercury pollution could be eliminated with the installation of pollution-control devices. Similar devices have proved very successful on municipal incinerators, which were once a significant source of mercury pollution.

But in January 2004 the Bush administration proposed to weaken and delay efforts to clean up mercury emissions from roughly 1,100 coal-fired boilers at more than 460 electric power plants. Essentially, the administration's plan treats mercury as if it were a run-of-the-mill air pollutant instead of a hazardous air pollutant, allowing the Environmental Protection Agency to avoid requiring power plants to reduce emissions by the maximum amount technologically achievable.

Chemical Manufacturing

Big mercury polluters also include older mercury chlorine plants, also called chlor-alkali plants. These plants use mercury to convert salt to chlorine gas and caustic soda (better known as lye), which is used in soaps and detergents, in plastics, and in the paper-making process. More modern chlor-alkali plants use a cleaner, mercury-free technology, but seven U.S. chlor-alkali plants continue to use mercury. (Two of these have announced plans to shift to cleaner technologies.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Probably coal emissions.
But my question is, why does this only address mercury levels in women? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. China as well. Can't blame them for doing what we did.
The air gets polluted, it falls into the ocean where the fish we eat swim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. While CFL's did not cause this, we need to implement safety/recycling/disposal of CFL's or this will
Edited on Wed Sep-02-09 04:45 PM by Faryn Balyncd



...worsen.


http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=7431198


(Please don't interpret this as anti-CFL.)



K&R, by the way.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Home Depot accepts CFL's for recycling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC