Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bacteria Used To Make Radioactive Metals Inert

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 06:24 AM
Original message
Bacteria Used To Make Radioactive Metals Inert
Obviously, it would be a far better thing to not spread radioactive material around in the first place. These days, isolation is S.O.P., but until at least the late 1950s, when military uses of uranium predominated, that wasn't the case. The sites at Hanford WA and much of Sellafield in England are probably the two best-known contaminated areas. Much progress has been made in their clean-up, but this method promises quicker, more thorough decontamination.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/09/090908193444.htm">Bacteria Used To Make Radioactive Metals Inert

ScienceDaily (Sep. 9, 2009) — The Lost Orphan Mine below the Grand Canyon hasn't produced uranium since the 1960s, but radioactive residue still contaminates the area. Cleaning the region takes an expensive process that is only done in extreme cases, but Judy Wall, a biochemistry professor at the University of Missouri College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources, is researching the use of sulfate-reducing bacteria to convert toxic radioactive metal to inert substances, a much more economical solution.

The bacteria Wall is studying are bio-corrosives and can change the solubility of heavy metals. They can take uranium and convert it to uraninite, a nearly insoluble substance that will sink to the bottom of a lake or stream. Wall is looking into the bacteria's water cleansing ability and how long the changed material would remain inert.

Wall's research could also be beneficial to heavy metal pollution from storage tanks and industrial waste. The bacteria are already present in more than 7,000 heavy metal contaminated sites, but they live in a specific range of oxygen and temperature, making them difficult to control.

...

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/09/090908193444.htm">There's more ...

--d!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's good to see this approach get some press.
Similar applications have been in the scientific literature for quite some time, including one near Rifle, Colorado.

We have no shortage of sites in need of remediation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. This sort of thing is known to have been responsible for the formation of many ore bodies around the
Edited on Sun Sep-13-09 08:34 AM by NNadir
world. Many ore bodies of various types are known to have formed in biological processes.

Similar effects are derived from chemical conditions at interfacial environments. For instance, uranium leachates at Oak Ridge - the danger of which is over rated in the public imagination, because the public is somewhat delusional - precipitated into an effective ore body when the leachate was exposed to a pH gradient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DLnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. The title and some of the statements are quite misleading.
No chemical, and hence no biological, process will change a radioactive atom to a non-radioactive one. Certainly it is possible to cause certain elements or compounds to precipitate (i.e. solidify out of a solution), and apparently these microbes cause that to happen. But to say that the "bacteria convert toxic radioactive metal to inert substances" or that "the changed material would remain inert" seems quite misleading. The material would move to the bottom of the lake, where it would be easier to collect and dispose of. It certainly would not stop being radioactive, which is what the term "inert" implies here.

Interesting article, but misleading terminology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Original Headline from University: Stinky little uranium traps
Edited on Sun Sep-13-09 01:56 PM by kristopher
This is a press release from the University of Missouri so it is quoted in full. The next generation headline you focused on reflects typical wishful thinking on the part of the nuclear industry.


Stinky little uranium traps
Sulfate-reducing bacteria smell terrible but can make radioactive toxins less harmful

The Lost Orphan Mine, in Coconino County, Ariz., sits just below the south rim of the Grand Canyon. While it hasn't produced uranium since the 1960s, its location between Maracopa Point and Powell Memorial makes it a natural tourist stop.

Radioactive tailings from the site still contaminate the area. Worse, the residue has leeched into nearby Horn Creek. Signs warn people not to drink the water. Hikers traversing the canyon rim must detour around the abandoned structures and 1,500-foot-deep mineshaft.

Cleaning up such an area, like thousands of similar weapons-production and Cold War sites, usually involves digging up the polluted ground, washing it, and putting it back. The process is so expensive and troublesome that it is employed only in extreme cases.
Judy Wall
Biochemistry professor Judy Wall. Photo by Nicholas Benner.

Judy Wall, a professor of biochemistry at the University of Missouri College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources, is working on an alternative way to clean up such sites.

Her laboratory, in partnership with the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in Berkeley, Calif., is looking at eventually using bacteria to reduce toxic metals to inert substances.

But don't get too close to the bacteria. They smell really bad.
Powerful bio-corrosives

"Have you ever come across a stagnant pool that smelled like rotten eggs when you disturbed it?" Wall asks. "Or have you wondered why iron pipes corrode in soil? Both the smell and the corrosion are caused by sulfate-reducing bacteria that derive energy not from oxygen but from sulfate, which is reduced to hydrogen sulfide, a particularly smelly and toxic gas."

Sulfate reducers are powerful bio-corrosives. When they come into contact with heavy metals, they cause an electron transfer reaction that changes the metals in a fundamental way.

The bacteria can take uranium and, through this electron transfer, reduce it to uraninite, a relatively insoluble mineral. Uraninite will sink to the bottom of a lake or stream, where it can do no harm. Wall's group is looking to better understand this water cleansing ability and to learn how long that modified material will remain inert.

It's just not radioactive metals. Heavy metal pollution from storage tanks and industrial waste—cobalt, strontium, cesium and plutonium—also may be treatable with sulfate reducers.

This potential has made the microscopic tilde-shaped critters a macro deal in the bio-remediation world. These bugs, or their close relatives, are likely to be already present in the contaminated sites—more than 7,000 heavy-metal-contaminated sites.

"We just need to add their favorite foods, depending on the site, to encourage them to interact with the metals," Wall said. The Department of Energy estimates there are at least 5,700 contaminated water bodies that also could be helped.

But there are problems. The bacteria live in a narrow range of oxygen and temperature. In fact, oxygen can kill most of them, making them difficult to use at sites like the Lost Orphan Mine. The bacteria also prefer to live in microbial communities with diverse neighbors. "We have little knowledge of their subdivision covenants," Wall explained.

"Our research with them must be carried out in the absence of air," she said. "Obviously, none but the most committed and stubborn will work with them."
Hold your nose; research in progress

Wall and her team are investigating the basic genetics and metabolism of these bacteria. They are building on discoveries funded by the Department of Energy's Joint Genome Institute that has sequenced the genomes of about 14 strains and is working on a dozen more.

With a roadmap of the 3,570,858 base pairs of DNA from the bacterium—the focus of her efforts—Wall hopes eventually to determine what limits the growth and activity of the strain in its natural setting and how to avoid those limitations. Making sure that the interactions with heavy metals is sustainable and robust is another goal.

To answer these questions, the team needs to discover the basic ways that sulfate reducers work. "Are the electrons that change toxic metals actually intended for other essential functions in the bacterium? Can we alter the distribution and flow of electrons inside the cell?" Wall asks.

So far, Wall and her colleagues have identified a couple of genes that are critical to the remediation of uranium. A small step but an important milestone in understanding how the microbes work, she says.

The specific strain that Wall and her colleagues are working with is called Desulfovibrio vulgaris, a hairy bacterium that moves by a micro rotary motor. Desulfovibrio strains have been found in an incredible variety of habitats, including soil, the intestines and feces of animals, and both saline and fresh water.

One of their favorite homes is in oil wells and petroleum processing plants, where these bacteria contribute to massive corrosion.

But even this cosmopolitan lifestyle creates another puzzle for Wall and her team. There is always something in these varied environments that limits the microorganism's growth. Even if an oxygen-tolerant strain were developed, it wouldn't likely remediate something like the Lost Orphan Mine site without careful attention.

"Knowledge of the communities of microbes is still in its infancy," Wall said. "We just don't know a lot about a number of individual microbes."


http://cafnr.missouri.edu/news/stories2009/uranium.php?utm_source=web&utm_medium=banner&utm_campaign=homepage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DLnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thanks. The press release seems to give a much better picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC