free by 2000, and that nuclear power was dying.
Does this "John Holden says"
bull from 1974 demonstrate that there is
one dumb fundie anti-nuke who has ever found
one person injured by the alleged
hazards of spent nuclear fuel?
No?
Does "John Holden said in 1974" bring back even ONE of the more than 20 million people who, um, died from the "hazards of dangerous fossil fuels" that all of our anti-nuke fundies didn't card about?
How about this one: Does John Holden holding the same office that John Marburger held, make him, um smarter than say, Hans Bethe or Enrico Fermi, if we have to do
stupid appeal to authority arguments?
Basically a fundie is a person whose ideas are not subject to change by
any amount of information and whose ideas are exactly the same in 2009 as they were in 1974.
Mostly the stupid anti-nukes here are all, in my mind, the sort of disco boppers in polyester suits that consume, consume and consume.
Their mentality is very, very, very, very, very, very, very seventies. There is NOT ONE fundie anti-nuke on this website who I regard as anything other than
high and
hallucinatory. Almost every anti-nuke has been
hallucinating all kinds of deaths from nuclear power.
Nuclear power is not perfect. It is not risk free. It doesn't need to be perfect or risk free to be vastly superior to all the stuff that dumb fundies don't care about, including the dangerous fossil fuels that lead the tens of millions of people dying since 1974.
A a nice, dumb
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/appeal-to-authority.html">Appeal to Authority day and be sure to share as much
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=228&topic_id=56734&mesg_id=56734">fundie pseudoscience and you can present in your spectacular appeals to fantasy.