Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

S. China Drought Stands 900 Ships At Reservoir Lock In Guangxi

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 01:24 PM
Original message
S. China Drought Stands 900 Ships At Reservoir Lock In Guangxi
Edited on Mon Mar-01-10 01:33 PM by hatrack

Stranded ships are seen in the waterway on Wuzhou City section of Xijiang River in south China's Guangxi Zhuang autonomous region on Saturday, Feb 27, 2010.

NANNING: Nine hundred ships jammed before a navigation lock of a reservoir in south China's Guangxi Zhuang autonomous region amid falling water level caused by severe drought, local authorities said Saturday.

The waterway traffic jam started on Tuesday and the number of stranded ships had been increasing on Wuzhou City section of Xijiang River, said an official with the city's maritime affairs department.

The rapid drop of the reservoir's water volume due to the drought and the increased transport demand after the Spring Festival were behind the waterway jam, the spokesman added.

The provincial maritime authorities had limited the number to ships sailing toward the reservoir to less than ten ships a day, he said. About 20 ships were let pass the navigation lock a day, he added.

EDIT

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2010-02/28/content_9514321.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. 900!! really bad news
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not necessarily -
how many ships there would it take to raise the water level back to navigable levels?

Looks like they're trying to find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Ahhhh, use the displacement of the ships to raise the water level.
Beats the hell out of my idea of filling it in with gravel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC