Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Don't call it waste wood; call it woody biomass

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Fledermaus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 06:24 PM
Original message
Don't call it waste wood; call it woody biomass
"This is as green as you get," Henriod says, holding a handful of damp, sweet-smelling wood chips.

"If we have a fuel source, why not use it?" Especially if it's free, renewable, bypasses the county landfill and cuts down on David E. Norman Elementary School's heating bill, which Henriod says costs the school a whopping $1,000 every three days in heating oil. The wood chips, if all works out according to plan, will keep students warm for free; the nutrient-rich potash Henriod shovels from the furnace periodically keeps county property green and its flowerbeds showpieces.

Still, one neighbor living near the school's mulch yard on Pinwheel Lane is uneasy about the joint venture between the White Pine County School District and the Nevada Forestry Department.

What the NFD is proposing is taking the school's mulch storage yard to the next level: encouraging county residents to bring their tree limbs to the site where they will be turned into fuel for the elementary school and into mulch for use by the county. The new buzzword for tree limbs and waste wood (but not construction waste) is woody biomass. And the area is rife with woody biomass.
http://www.elynews.com/articles/2010/03/10/lifestyle/life01.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. How about we call a source of dangerous particulate pollution?
Edited on Wed Mar-10-10 06:51 PM by NNadir
Would that work?

I can produce a paper, and I'm working on a post to discuss this in the context of the 65 million people who will die in China in the next 23 years from COPD, comparing the carcinogenicity of wood smoke and the carcinogenicity of um, cigarettes.

It will be a fun post I'm sure, but will not generate as much concern and heat as a harmless tritium atom in Vermont.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fledermaus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Same old misleading info you always post.
Do you get paid by the post?

Modern furnaces have nothing in common with people cooking indoors over an open fire pit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC