Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Farming is mainly to blame for the loss of our native plants and wildlife

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 10:37 AM
Original message
Farming is mainly to blame for the loss of our native plants and wildlife
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/mar/14/threat-english-plants-species-wildlife

Farming is mainly to blame for the loss of our native plants and wildlife

Report by Natural England warns of risk to species and habitats

Robin McKie, science editor
The Observer, Sunday 14 March 2010

England was given an uncomfortable reminder last week of the impact of its swelling number of inhabitants. Over the past two millennia, hundreds of its native plants and animals have been rendered extinct because the human population has risen from about one million to more than 51 million.

Victims have ranged from the great auk and the lynx to the humble blue stag beetle and Davall's sedge. More to the point, 480 of the 492 species made extinct since Roman times have disappeared in the past two centuries. Rates of eradication are rising, a trend that bodes badly for the future of the countryside, a report states.

Produced by Natural England, the government agency responsible for the countryside, "Lost Life: England's Lost and Threatened Species" focuses only on wildlife on English soil, although it has broad lessons for all of Britain. We live on "a fortress built by Nature for herself", Shakespeare claimed. If so, she is now paying a heavy price for its construction, as the study makes clear.

According to the report, a total of 24% of butterfly species and 22% of amphibians have been wiped out in England, along with individual types of wildlife such as Mitten's beardless moss; York groundsel, a weed only discovered in the 1970s; and Ivell's sea anemone, which was last seen in a lagoon near Chichester. Add to this the wolf, the wildcat and other large mammals and the level of devastation of our wildlife becomes chillingly apparent.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Boycott vegetables!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. !! yeah !!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. add logging, overbuilding,pollution, etc....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well, paul bunyan's ax wasn't much more help than mr. deere's plow
In the midwest there is not much 'original' landscape that hasn't been cleared or furrowed at one time or another.
But many pastoral landscapes here there are still a lot of remants if you look closely. Which is why I used to do in-service workshops for rural k-12 teachers called 'Beside the Plow and Cow.'

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. Look deeper for cause and we might find it is that nasty habit people have
...that eating habit.

When a species gets really good at survival, its numbers increase and it exerts an ever-increasing influence on the environment. Humans have gotten really good at survival. The cost is we are eating ourselves out of house and home.

Don't blame farmers. They are just doing what the rest of the species wants done - provide food. Framing farming is just more refusal to accept reality. For something to live, something else must perish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. Agriculture has also been responsible for many of the ills attributed to nuclear power...
... such as birth defects, cancer, etc.

People always talked about "clusters" of cancer and birth defects around the shut down Rancho Seco nuclear power plant in California, yet if these clusters truly existed they were almost certainly the consequence of extremely toxic agricultural chemicals and drainage.

Anecdotally, I remember waters that would burn my skin. My skin would literally turn red, almost like sunburn, wherever it had touched the water. It could have been the result of toxins from algae, decomposition, and other water quality issues, but I suspect the overall harsh chemistry was mostly the result of agricultural chemicals and nasty substances leached from the soil by inappropriate irrigation practices. I wouldn't stick my arms into any sort of agricultural runoff these days.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. That's absolutely ridiculous...
Big Agriculture is the problem. The fucking farming CORPORATIONS are the problem. Real farmers deserve our respect and admiration for putting up with the vagaries of Corporate control over our food system.


This article misses the point entirely...

:shrug:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Most of the species listed in this report went extinct over 50 years ago
At a time when farms were still small and family operated.

Wolves, for example, were hunted to extinction in the 1700's in the UK to stop sheep predation.

While Big Ag is the primary cause today, expanding agriculture in general due to a growing population is the driving force in these extinctions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. Lawns of green grass do more harm than crops that feed people IMO. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. do`t worry..when the humans get culled....
mother earth will go about her merry way and she`ll make a new planet...she`s done it before and she`ll do it again......

after all we are just passing through
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wildlife challenge: England’s lost and threatened species
http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/about_us/news/2010/110310.aspx

Wildlife challenge: England’s lost and threatened species

11 March 2010

First ever audit of all of England’s lost and declining native species

Centuries of conservation records go under the microscope


Natural England has launched the most complete audit of hundreds of years of England’s wildlife winners and losers to an audience of leading conservationists at the Zoological Society of London today (11 March).

Lost Life: England’s Lost and Threatened Species identifies nearly 500 animals and plants that have become extinct in England – practically all within the last two centuries. On top of this, nearly 1,000 native species have been given conservation priority status because of the severity of the threats facing them.

Dr Helen Phillips, Chief Executive of Natural England, said: “Coinciding with the International Year of Biodiversity, this report is a powerful reminder that we cannot take our wildlife for granted and that we all lose when biodiversity declines. Every species has a role and, like rivets in an aeroplane, the overall structure of our environment is weakened each time a single species is lost. Biodiversity matters and with more and more of our species and habitats confined to isolated, protected sites we need to think on a much broader geographical scale about how we can reverse the losses of the recent past and secure a more solid future for our wildlife.”

The Lost Life report highlights how habitat loss, inappropriate management, environmental pollution and pressure from non-native species have all played a part in the erosion of England’s biodiversity. All of the major groups of flora and fauna have experienced losses, with butterflies, amphibians, and many plant and other insect species being particularly hard hit – in some groups up to a quarter of species have been become extinct since 1800.

Despite these pressures, conservation efforts have achieved many notable successes in protecting priority species and habitats – including the return of the red kite and the large blue butterfly. Nevertheless, losses continue and 943 native species are now classed as a conservation priority, while the numbers of several hundred more are in significant decline. Some of England’s most familiar species – including the red squirrel, common toad, and European eel – face an uncertain future.

To provide long-term support for our wildlife, Natural England is working with a range of partners in the England Biodiversity Group to adopt a “landscape-scale” approach to conservation which goes beyond the conservation of small protected sites and individual species and embraces the management of entire landscape areas and the ecosystems that operate within them. Wide-scale restoration of habitats and ecosystems and linking of habitat areas are seen as key to taking the pressure off the biodiversity hotspots of individual sites and reserves and giving broader support to wildlife in the wider countryside.

Dr Helen Phillips continued: “Current conservation programmes have been central to supporting England’s biodiversity and they show that we can reverse some of the losses of the past. But firefighting to rescue species in severe decline can never be a long-term solution. We need a step-change in conservation that goes beyond the targeted work that has gone on to protect individual sites and species, and which focuses on restoring the health of ecosystems across entire landscapes. We have to give wildlife and habitats more room to thrive and only by tackling the problems of environmental decline in this co-ordinated way, and at this sort of scale, can we succeed in halting and ultimately reversing many of the recent declines in biodiversity.”

-Ends-

Notes to editors

Copies of the full report - http://naturalengland.etraderstores.com/NaturalEnglandShop/NE233">Lost Life: England’s Lost and Threatened Species - can be downloaded from the Natural England website.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlancheSplanchnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. the problem at the bottom of ALL of it:
too many people.

It's overpopulation, people. Human needs must be met, and though it's sad, we will bulldoze anything that gets in our way.

A world with no more beautiful animals is not one I want to live in.

I'm feeling especially sensitive about this, since last night we saw a program on Nova, about the last few individual animals left in several species. I couldn't stop sobbing.

What will it take for people to reduce their breeding??????? Will we ever even bother? Do our biological urges and romantic notions have to kill everything before we act responsibly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC