Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jack-Booted Socialism! Texas PUC Considering Tougher Efficiency Standards, Expanded Renewables

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 12:37 PM
Original message
Jack-Booted Socialism! Texas PUC Considering Tougher Efficiency Standards, Expanded Renewables
Texas regulators may soon ramp up mandates requiring tougher energy-efficiency standards and development of renewable energy sources other than wind power. Earlier this year, the state’s Public Utility Commission proposed requiring utilities to offset 50 percent of their growth in electricity sales with energy-efficiency measures by 2014. That would be well above the current requirement of 20 percent. (Separately, another state agency last week proposed strengthening Texas’s building codes.)

The utility commission has also put forward an early-stage proposal that would require 500 new megawatts of power in Texas to come from renewable energy sources like biomass, geothermal, solar and hydro in 2014. That represents a substantial increase from current amounts, though it is still small compared to the amount of wind power already in the state.

Texas leads the nation in wind development, but under the proposal, 50 megawatts of nonwind renewables in 2014 would have to come from solar projects. Texas currently has less than seven megawatts of solar power, according to Michael Webber, the associate director of the Center for International Energy and Environmental Policy at the University of Texas.

Both proposals are still receiving comments, and must be approved by the three commissioners, who are appointed by the Texas governor. Environmentalists, however, are hopeful that the measures will go through relatively unscathed — and soon.

EDIT

http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/29/texas-weighs-efficiency-solar-mandates/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tech9413 Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Since Texass has such a high percentage of sunny days
Go for solar thermal installations. They are the most cost effective and cheapest to build. The only moving parts would be the steam turbine (located on the ground and easier to service)which are current technology. This technology could do the 500 MW and be in operation easily by 2014. It could also be updated with technological innovations that build on the original installation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They only need 50MW.
Not that they shouldn't build more but the mandate is pretty easy to meet.

500MW total (they have >500MW wind already).
50MW of that needs to be non-wind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC