Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

James Hansen proposes "People’s Climate Stewardship / Carbon Fee and Dividend Act of 2010"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 09:39 AM
Original message
James Hansen proposes "People’s Climate Stewardship / Carbon Fee and Dividend Act of 2010"
http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2010/20100425_PeoplesBill.pdf

People’s Climate Stewardship / Carbon Fee and Dividend Act of 2010:

...

Therefore, we propose the People’s Climate Stewardship Act:

  1. Collection of Carbon Fees/Carbon Fee Trust Fund: Beginning on July 1, 2011, a carbon fee of $15 per ton of CO2 equivalent emissions will be imposed on all fossil fuels at the point of first sale in the U.S. economy. CO2 equivalent fees shall also be imposed for other greenhouse gases including methane, nitrous oxide, sulfur hexafluoride, hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) emitted as byproducts, perfluorocarbons, and nitrogen trifluoride. All fees are to be returned to American households as outlined below.

  2. Steady step-up of CC2 Fees, Ensuring Replacement of Fossil Fuels with Low-Carbon Energy: The yearly increase in carbon fees including other greenhouse gasses shall be at least $10 per ton of CO2 equivalent each year, to steadily reduce U.S. CO2-equivalent emissions by 2050 to 10% of the 1990 U.S. CO2-equivalent emissions. EPA and DOE shall annually review greenhouse gas emissions data and determine whether an increase larger than $10 per ton per year is needed to achieve emissions reductions commensurate with that reduction trajectory. If EPA and DOE find that U.S. emissions are not being reduced sufficiently, the CO2 fee shall increase by $15/T CO2 in the following year.

  3. Mechanisms for 100% Revenue Return: All revenue from CO2 and CO2 equivalent fees shall be returned to households. Mechanisms include: (1) Equal monthly per-person “dividend” payments made to all U.S. households (1/2 per child under 18 years old, with a limit of 2 children per family) each month beginning on August 28, 2011, (2) Use all carbon fee revenue to reduce payroll taxes for employers and employees. Unemployed persons and Social Security recipients shall receive equivalent distributions.

  4. Border Adjustments: To ensure that U.S.-made goods remain competitive abroad and to provide an additional incentive for U.S. trading partners to adopt their own carbon fees, Carbon-Fee-Equivalent Tariffs shall be charged for goods entering the U.S. from countries without comparable Carbon Fees. Carbon-Fee-Equivalent rebates shall reduce the price of exports to such countries and ensure that U.S. goods remain competitive in those countries.
...

(Follow the link for a PDF of the entire proposal.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Exactly what the doctor ordered. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. Too easy.
I mean it is simple and would radically change the "playing field" while at the same time being a CO2 ratchet (costs for carbon only go up, emissions only go down).

Hell with a bill like this I would be for ending all non R&D subsidies for all forms of power (not just fossil fuels).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is the single payer of climate change.
The best, most economical, most fair approach you can go.

Unfortunately, like single payer, it doesn't have a chance in hell of passing. *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I like that "single payer of climate change".
Sadly I agree with your assessment.

Congress tends to not like simple, universal, fair ideas. It makes them less iportant.

Congress could pass this, cut all subsidies for all forms of energy (keep a pool of money for energy R&D funding) and the system would take care of its self.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. It would have a chance of passing
if Obama got behind it.

Not the way he got behind healthcare - a pulling-all-stops-out, my-way-or-the-highway effort. No negotiation, but start low with the tax.

Better yet - start with the dividend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Like in Canada, it's political suicide to *not* back such a plan.
Too bad we're not that way here. It'd be spun spun spun so badly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. This guy rocks.
If only congress had listened to him in 1988 we could have been well on our way to greatly reducing emissions and increased revenue collection already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. If you like his proposal
I suggest you drop a line to your US Representative and Senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Done.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 04:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. That would be so good ...
... wonder if we could get someone to propose a similar thing over here? (UK)

:think:

(Yes, I know that it is an "ideal world" target but without such targets,
what chance do we have at getting there?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC