Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gulf Oil Spill - Bigger Than Exxon Valdez (SkyTruth blog, sobering images)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 01:31 AM
Original message
Gulf Oil Spill - Bigger Than Exxon Valdez (SkyTruth blog, sobering images)
Edited on Fri Apr-30-10 01:32 AM by joshcryer
http://blog.skytruth.org/

This, and other radar images that SkyTruth is getting, confirm what we've seen on the NASA/MODIS images so far, and support our conservative calculations showing that in the first week of this spill at least 6 million gallons have entered the Gulf. That's a spill rate of at least 850,000 gallons (20,000 barrels) per day, 20 times larger than the official Goast Guard estimate of 42,000 gallons per day.

The Australia blowout and spill took 10 weeks to control.

The Exxon Valdez tanker spill totaled 11 million gallons. We could exceed that in just a few days, if we haven't already.


They go on to talk about how they made their calculations in earlier posts. I don't see anything particularly bad with it, and at least one professional in the field thinks they're being conservative.

This is a disaster. (Sorry XemaSab for distracting from your post btw.)

Response vessels vs oil slick (in the early stages of the event, it is now more than three times the size):
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think there's enough horror to go around here
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BunkerHill24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe investing in Oil Sands aren't that bad after all! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Man-made ecological disaster on land is no better than
man-made ecological disaster at sea.

Fourteen percent of the energy used in my state now comes from wind. It can be done.

Sticking with the failed and fatal technologies of the past is a big mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. Who is going to clean it up?
If any DUers along the Gulf Coast want to organize and get involved in the remediation, send me a PM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC