Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Power Plants along the Gulf coast.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 11:58 AM
Original message
Power Plants along the Gulf coast.
These power plants use gulf waters for cooling.

How many nuke plants are there? Anyone know?

And what will oily waters do to the cooling systems?

Will the plants have to be shut down as the polluted waters hit the intakes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. But they power our LCD screens and internet connections


Leave private industry alone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here is a map
Edited on Tue May-04-10 12:11 PM by Statistical
Map is kinda crude but looks like 2 in TX and one in LA on the coast at a minimum. Also you got 5 plants in FL but not sure if they are all on the coast or the that is just a limit of maps accuracy.



So 3 to 8 nuclear plants and who knows how many other thermal plants.

Not sure how many of them pull directly from the Gulf.
If they do hopefully the water is pulled from a cove of inlet which can be protected by spill boons.

Of course this doesn't just apply to nuclear plants. Any thermal plant (coal, oil, nuclear, natural gas combined cycle, solar thermal) requires condenser water (turn steam back into liquid and pull waste heat from plant).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Was curious so I looked it up the ones in TX & LA won't be affected.
Edited on Tue May-04-10 12:25 PM by Statistical
LA is Waterford 3:
It is east of New Orleans and up stream of the Gulf inlet.
http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=29.995,-90.471389&spn=0.01,0.01&t=h&q=29.995,-90.471389

TX is South Texas 1 & 2:
It is inland and looks from the sat map to have an artificial lake for condenser water.
http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=28.7955,-96.049&spn=0.01,0.01&t=h&q=28.7955,-96.049

The South Texas Project is a pretty interesting setup. Looks like it draws from one side of the "lake" and returns it on the other side. The lake is constructed like a maze meaning water has to flow some distance (evaporating heating) before it gets back to reactor. Also since it is an artificial lake they eliminate the need for cooling towers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC