Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jack-Booted Thugs! Feds Ban Pipeline Use In Cook Inlet - Only 60% Of Pipe Lost To Corrosion!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 12:31 PM
Original message
Jack-Booted Thugs! Feds Ban Pipeline Use In Cook Inlet - Only 60% Of Pipe Lost To Corrosion!
And that's at the thinnest portion - how dare those freedumb-hatin' paper-pushers hamper America's entrepreneurial spirit??!?!?

A major oil company's request to continue using a corroded undersea pipeline at an offshore platform in Cook Inlet has been roundly rejected by federal regulators.

As a result, the company, Chevron Corp., said it shut down oil production at its Anna Platform last week. Before the shutdown, the platform on the west side of Cook Inlet had been producing roughly 900 barrels of oil per day.

Before the shutdown, Chevron sought a waiver from federal rules that require pipelines in sensitive locations to be repaired when corrosion has eaten away more than 50 percent of their wall thickness.

In one section of pipe near the seafloor, the line had lost more than 60 percent of its wall thickness. Instead of fixing it, Chevron asked for permission a year ago to keep using the corroded pipeline indefinitely. Chevron proposed to inspect the pipeline periodically and inspect the area weekly by air to look for an oil sheen.

EDIT

http://www.adn.com/2010/05/07/1268807/feds-nix-corroded-undersea-pipe.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. What the hell, we could kill the oceans at twice the speed
If they continued to use it we could come at it from two directions and it will be done sooner.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. One Wonders, Sir, Why Bother With Pipe At All Then; They Could Just Pump Oil Directly Into The Ocean
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Suck it up, soldier! That pipeline is 40% *uncorroded*!
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 03:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. They actually *proposed* to wait until it had failed and actively leaking before fixing it?!
Edited on Tue May-11-10 03:52 AM by Nihil
> Instead of fixing it, Chevron asked for permission a year ago to keep
> using the corroded pipeline indefinitely. Chevron proposed to inspect
> the pipeline periodically and inspect the area weekly by air to look
> for an oil sheen.

:wtf:

Yet the request was only "roundly rejected by federal regulators" after nearly
a year's worth of additional extraction (and spill risk) - and probably only
even then as the Gulf spill was front & centre on everyone's radar.

Note also that the "federal regulators" didn't order Chevron to shut down
the pipe but said that it would be "potentially subject to enforcement action".

Sounds like real tough "regulators" there ...

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC