Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Areva To Provide MOX Nuclear Fuel To Recently Completed Japanese Nuclear Reactor.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 10:42 PM
Original message
Areva To Provide MOX Nuclear Fuel To Recently Completed Japanese Nuclear Reactor.
France's Areva has signed a contract to supply mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel for use in unit 3 of Hokkaido Electric Power Co's Tomari nuclear power reactor in Japan.

Under the terms of the contract, signed with Mitsubishi Nuclear Fuel (MNF), Areva will fabricate the MOX fuel at its Melox plant using plutonium recovered from used fuel at its La Hague reprocessing plant. MNF designed the MOX fuel to be used by Hokkaido...

...Construction of the 866 MWe Tomari 3 pressurized water reactor began in 2003. The reactor reached criticality on 3 March 2009 and test operations followed on 20 March. It was connected to the grid in December.

...About 5% of the content of MOX fuel is plutonium recovered from nuclear fuel already used in power-generating reactors. Recycling the material in this way increases the energy it produces by 12%, while if unfissioned uranium is also recovered and reused the figure increases to 22%. The process also allows the separation of the most highly radioactive fission products, meaning the volume of the most dangerous waste is reduced by over 60%...



http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/ENF-MOX_fuel_contract_for_Hokkaido_reactor-3003104.html">MOX fuel contract for Hokkaido reactor.

A note about the Tomari Reactor:

The average continuous power of all wind turbines in Denmark produced, in 2006 was 22 petajoules (0.022 exajoules): http://www.ens.dk/en-US/supply/Renewable-energy/WindPower/Facts-about-Wind-Power/Key-figures-statistics/Sider/Forside.aspx">Figures of the Danish Energy Agency.

Every year, year after year after year after year, the year still contains 31,557,600 seconds.

This means that the average continuous power of all the wind turbines in Denmark is about 700 MWe, not that the power is delivered reliably - much of it is dumped at below market prices because it is available at times of low demand.

Thus, to produce as much energy in a single relatively small building as Denmark can produce in a whole country of whirling metal - constructed over 28 years - the Tomari reactor, built in six years, need operate at (100)700/866 = 80% of capacity utilization, something that is relatively easy to do, since most nuclear reactors operate at better than 90% capacity utilization.

Here is a photograph of a MOX fuel pellet:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I guess the Japanese aren't interested in stupid charts from lightweight bloggers
with contempt for and ignorance of the science of Fermi, Chadwick, Rutherford and Bohr.

We'll just add economics to the list of stuff that anti-nukes are incompetent to understand, particularly since they are clueless about the electricity rates of Denmark as compared to France.

http://www.energy.eu/#Domestic

That's not a dumb chart from a clueless uneducated anti-science brat. It's "data." Real numbers.

If wind worked so great, the damn Danes wouldn't be drilling fucking oil and gas all over their seas.

http://ens.dk/EN-US/OILANDGAS/Sider/Oilandgas.aspx

Have a nice "can't tell one number from another" evening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Go2Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Gee, it seemed like you might go more than a day without declaring intellectual superiority
Edited on Sat May-15-10 01:33 AM by Go2Peace
I guess I was wrong.

I know, me "Cretin", you "intellectual superstar".

Your opinion "enlightened, perfect" and "no calories", everyone else's opinion "stupid", "ignorant", and full of shit.

Your language overwhelms your posts. I doubt anyone notices much of the content, except for others with the same values and temperament.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 05:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I have contempt for the make-believe NJ molten salt breeder reactor
Edited on Sat May-15-10 05:58 AM by jpak
dreamed up by light-weight bloggers on the internets

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. So I guess the $20+ billion Japanese Rokkasho reprocessing plant doesn't work - does it
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. The plant works fine. However its capacity is not large enough for the expanding Japanese
Nuclear industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. ummm...it is not operational, it was supposed to open in 2004 - and it's billions overbudget
try again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC