Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sea Breeze, Delaware Residents Give Up - Seawall Can't Stop Ocean's Advance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 12:08 PM
Original message
Sea Breeze, Delaware Residents Give Up - Seawall Can't Stop Ocean's Advance
FAIRFIELD TOWNSHIP — The last holdouts on Sea Breeze’s south end have agreed to sell their homes to the state, signaling the beginning of the end of this isolated Delaware Bay community in Cumberland County. Fourteen sales have closed, and six others were scheduled to do so several weeks ago, state Department of Environmental Protection spokesman Larry Ragonese said. Another six are still under negotiation, but Sea Breeze homeowners say those deals are all but done. Thirteen homes remain on the north end, and homeowners say they could be next.

"There is a plan to do something environmental with that area, but that plan hasn’t been finalized yet," Ragonese said. Most homeowners have emptied their houses already, giving up their views of the bay that laps along the seawall separating their homes from the water. Many have done so reluctantly. Bob Spence, a retired plant operator at DuPont’s Deepwater facility, said he didn’t want to sell. For months, a large sign stood in front of his house accusing state and local government officials of stealing his home. "It was my dream for the longest time to be able to retire here," said Spence, who lives in Pennsville. "Now it’s been sucked out of me."

The community has been losing its battle with the bay for years, as the encroaching waves and erosion cut into the shore on which their homes sit. Makeshift bulkheads failed and were replaced many times before homeowners finally stepped back and let the state build the seawall. That, too, failed, forcing homeowners who once spurned the idea of selling to accept offers. The last homeowner could move out by summer. Several homeowners say they were shortchanged by the state and local governments, who put them in a position where they were forced to sell. In 2007, the state completed construction of a seawall to protect the community from the rising tide of Delaware Bay.

For years, the homeowners had built their own makeshift bulkheads. After then-Fairfield Township Mayor Craig Thomas and current state Senate President Steve Sweeney took up their cause, the homeowners agreed to cede some of their bayside land for the wall and reconstruction of Beach Avenue, which had washed away. The seawall began to fail within months, as storms battered it into a disjointed collection of blocks, with only parts of the structure remaining stable. Some homeowners feel paving the road would have helped, but the township refused to do so after cost overruns and Thomas’ replacement by one-term mayor Marion Kennedy Jr. changed matters. When they wanted to fix the road themselves, the homeowners were forbidden from doing so.

EDIT

http://www.northjersey.com/news/environment/local_environment/93873654_Holdouts_quit_as_sea_closes_in.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. seawalls are horrible - they just amplify beach erosion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. It is hard to generate any sympathy whatsoever for these people
The fact is that it appears the state and local governments have already dumped a bunch of money into a seawall for this SMALL group of people. Why in the world do these people think that the rest of the state OWED them a seawall in the first place?

One thing is certain, our society is going to have to come to a decsion rather quickly about how to handle the rising seas in regard to homeowners. Trying to reign in the power of the ocean with seawalls is futile and unfair to the rest of society especially as we enter the age of rising oceans due to global warming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. What if someone were to apply your cold logic to New Orleans
Relatively small group of people who seem to thing the rest of us should protect their poor located homes that are beneath sea level...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. "cold logic" would suggest it's not wise to build below a flood plain,
,
,
,

Venice is one thing

coastal North America is another.

and besides

NO is right at the mouth of hurricane alley if I remember correctly

like

MANY disasters waiting to happen

time to move on

Katrina was just a gentle warning . . .

And y'all MUST know that the gobment isn't gonna do jack-shit for those in that area unless they can see some votes/money in it for them

so

time to move on

Momma nature has given the people down there ample warning

and NOW

there's that oil spill just heading up there to make things worse

what happens if a hurricane/tornado/whatever picks up some of that slick and throws it inland?

time to move on folks . . .

don't wait for the answers

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Those be fighing words to many, but unless there is some sort of ROI, your comments make a great
of sense. There is clearly a racial component to what is to be done in NO, but building below sea level is never a good idea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. To be fair, the folks in New Orleans did not build their homes on the beach
I will also offer that the majority of folks that lost their homes in NO were not wealthy nor were they offered a buyout for their property.

It seems obvious that our society will be increasingly dealing with the problem of rising seas and ocean front properties. It is inevitable that many thousands of areas will be in crisis in the years ahead.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Very true.
> Trying to reign in the power of the ocean with seawalls is futile
> and unfair to the rest of society

It is not the responsibility of government to compensate for the
outcome of poor decisions made by individuals.

Welcome to the real world folks.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC