Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Follow the $$$ - Media ignores Goldman Sachs’ ties to Corexit dispersant and BP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:33 PM
Original message
Follow the $$$ - Media ignores Goldman Sachs’ ties to Corexit dispersant and BP

On May 20, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a directive requiring BP to identify and use a less toxic and more effective dispersant from the list of EPA authorized dispersants. Dispersants are a chemical used to break up oil into small droplets so that they are more easily degraded. To read more about the EPA's directive, click here.

Even though the dispersant BP is currently using is on the EPA's approved list, it is being used in unprecedented volumes and used for underwater treatment, which the extent of its environmental impacts are unknown. Journalist Paula Quinlan questions why BP is using the 100 % toxic, 54 percent effective dispersant Corexit to clean up the oil when twelve other dispersants proved more effective in EPA testing.

Quinlan associates BP’s investment in Nalco and oil industry representation on the board as the main reasons that Corexit was used instead of Dispirsit, which EPA testing shows to be twice as effective and a third less toxic. Yes, BP is hedging its losses with the profit it will make with its investment in Nalco, but who else benefits?


Follow the money…and the money goes to Goldman Sachs and friends.

--------------


Media ignores Goldman Sachs’ ties to Corexit dispersant

In a recent New York Times’ article “Less Toxic Dispersants Lose Out in BP Oil Spill Cleanup”, journalist Paula Quinlan questions why BP is using the 100 % toxic, 54 percent effective dispersant Corexit to clean up the oil when twelve other dispersants proved more effective in EPA testing.

BP spokesman Jon Pack defended the use of Corexit, which he said was decided in consultation with EPA. He called Corexit “pretty effective” and said the product had been “rigorously tested.”

..cont'd

http://www.bearmarketinvestments.com/goldman-sachs-the-oil-volcano?utm_source=Austin+EcoNewsletter&utm_campaign=559bce36d4-econewsletter_12_15_0912_14_2009&utm_medium=email
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. All slithery roads seem to lead to GS.
GS stock was doing well today, BP not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC