Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In a sick way, the Gulf Oil Spill will be a defining moment in physical and biological oceanography

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-10 10:12 PM
Original message
In a sick way, the Gulf Oil Spill will be a defining moment in physical and biological oceanography
Edited on Sun Jun-20-10 10:35 PM by jpak
Most folks may not realize that much of what we know about ocean circulation was the result of atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons and the mass production of ozone-depleting chlorofluorocarbons. As these nasties dissolved in the ocean from the atmosphere, they left a trail of bread crumbs that oceanographers began to follow...

Tracers in the sea : W. S. Broecker and T. H. Peng. Eldigio Press Lamont Doherty Geological Observatory, 1982, 690 pages

and many others...

Satellite imagery of the progression of the current spill will produce updated models of surface ocean circulation in the GOM and elsewhere!



Documentation of the subsurface plumes of methane, sulfide and micron-scale micelle petroleum emulsion -however spotty and incomplete (due to lack of funding !!!!!!11111) - will provide biological oceanographers with new insight how the new and dissolved-oxygen-depleted-multicellular-eukaryote-free central Gulf of Mexico ecosystem operates!

Sorry if I can't post more, my yacht is racing today!

Thank you SOOOoooooo much BP, for your contribution to ocean science...

Please sir, can we have some more?

:puke:

:puke:

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-10 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think it's actually..
Thank you sir, may I have another?

Interesting topic though..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-10 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm sorry, but in this fiction, it's "please sir"
yup

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-10 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Here's the scene I was referring to..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Uh, only as a side effect, the primary science will be to follow the destruction...
...and to try to pin down how bad it's affecting the environment and how quickly it is being coped with by nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. My Phys Ocean colleagues say we really know very little about Gulf Circulation
Especially the subsurface circulation. We are about to find out a lot more on that subject.
There will be a fair amount of funding. BP alone is putting in 50 mill a year for 5 years. That is about the amount NSF puts in to all of ocean science basic research. Of course it won't be enough, we already lag behind the Europeans in basic ocean science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. There will be a lot of oil-contaminated CTDs and GoFlo's up for bid on eBay in the next few years
and underway flow-through systems too.

Hope BP replaces all that stuff....and monitors the health of spill workers/researchers for the next 20 years. Breathing that volatile stuff cannot be good.

nope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. It's worse than that
They tell me that the o-ring seals on all of these instruments are susceptible to being dissolved by the oil. The advice is to only deploy an instrument for 1 week or less, then replace the seals. Since the usual practice is to deploy something like a current meter for months at a time, this requires a whole different level of effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I wonder if anything will be publishable given the level of crud those devices will encounter
Edited on Mon Jun-21-10 11:37 AM by jpak
one CTD cast and your done - the Niskin/GoFlos bottles will be too contaminated for further use.

I suppose they can use a boatload of XBTs instead of CTD casts for temperature profiles though....

I guess long-term sediment trap arrays with ADCP's are not possible either...which is too bad because a lot of that oil will eventually sediment out of the water column....

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC