Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Interview with Matthew R. Simmons (Twilight in the Desert) Part 1

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 03:48 PM
Original message
Interview with Matthew R. Simmons (Twilight in the Desert) Part 1
Edited on Thu Jun-09-05 03:57 PM by phantom power
There are links to parts 2 and 3 at the top. Very interesting interview, the exerpt below is just a teaser. One thing I thought was odd, he claims to be a big Bush supporter. I don't see how anybody who is so deeply aware of the peak oil issue could support the disaster that is BushCo.

SPK: Let me make clear the assumption underlying my next question: if the insurgency in Iraq ends how much oil do you think Iraq can bring online in spare capacity? That it's not already producing now, obviously they have some serious problems because the guerillas are blowing up pipelines left and right, etc, so what I am saying is: if the insurgency ends, what kind of oil can we expect from Iraq?

MRS: The most serious problems that the Iraq oil system has is the two old giant oil fields, Kirkuk and Rumelia, were basically around 80-85% of their sustainable oil production in the 80s and 90s and both of those fields have been terribly abused, over the last two years and they finally were able to, about six to nine weeks ago, to let two contracts to have the first serious reservoir studies done of those fields since the late 1970s. And my sense is that what the reservoir field studies will show, if they are done properly is that they basically destroyed those two fields.

And now the question shifts to, well, what about all these structures they have discovered that have basically never been developed? Well Saudi Arabia has 80 of those structures, but for some reason or another in the $50 billion plan of all these old fields they are trying to rebuild, not a single one of the 80 is being tackled.

So, I suspect that in Iraq they must be a little bit like Saudi Arabia's structures. You know, they are pushing these things so hard they had the money, and it really isn't that expensive to actually bring on a new field that you've already discovered.

Then there's the question about exploration in the Western Desert. They clearly haven't, but they've explored extensively in Syria and Jordan and in the Arabian Peninsula and they have never found anything.

If we were evaluating an IPO of an exploration project in the Western Desert Of Iraq I'd say, "until you found something you couldn't raise any money for it."


http://agonist.org/story/2005/6/3/124329/2939
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Linkie? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Oops, I added the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. One thing about this interview that's disturbing...
His analysis of the water-pumping practices strongly suggests that when peak oil hits, it won't be a gradual decline. It will be a relatively fast collapse in production. The worst possible scenario, where the rug gets pulled out from under everybody. From pumping millions of barrels per day, down to hundreds of thousands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sean-Paul Kelley Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Re: One thing about this interview that's disturbing..."
Yes, you are exactly correct. That is precisely the idea he was articulating. It's not a popular one among oilmen, especially as it's true. Most people seem to be allergic to that these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Denial is easier than admitting that the world as we know it is ending.
Reminds me of a scene from The Titanic.

(deluded passenger) But the Titanic is unsinkable!

(Titanic's designer) Oh, I assure you, she can sink. She's made of metal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sean-Paul Kelley Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yeah,
It does remind me of that! No doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terry in Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Bottle-brush drilling
Hyper-extraction techniques used at Ghawar

From last year's ASPO conference:

With bottle brush drilling, a shaft is drilled horizontally over long distances with a number of brush-like openings... However, when the water table hits the horizontal shaft, often without warning, the whole field is virtually dead.. this is exactly what had already happened in Oman, Syria and Yemen.


Ghawar is the world's biggest oil field. It could play out at any time:

“... Ghawar ’s ultimate recoverable reserves in 1975 were estimated at 60 billion barrels. ...It had produced 55 billion barrels up to the end of 2003 and is still producing at 1.8 billion per annum. That shows you how close it might be to the end. When Ghawar dies, the world is officially in decline.”



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC