Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feds, States Meet On Declining Gulf Of Mexico Health - Behind Closed Doors

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 12:27 PM
Original message
Feds, States Meet On Declining Gulf Of Mexico Health - Behind Closed Doors
NAPLES -- "The Gulf of Mexico was in the spotlight for the first time Thursday as policymakers and scientists from five Gulf states -- Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida -- and the federal government gathered here to discuss its declining health. Two blue-ribbon ocean commissions have said the Gulf is polluted, overfished and neglected, and this week's gathering is being heralded as the start of a regional effort to reverse that trend.

But Thursday's gathering did little to convince environmentalists monitoring the Gulf that government leaders will embrace their ideas and work to restore its health. The federal and state policymakers met behind closed doors and later met with the press, but not environmentalists.

Those same government leaders won't be present today when environmentalists and other members of the public gather at this first meeting of its kind, which is being held at Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve.

EDIT

Jim Connaughton, chairman of the White House Council on Environmental Quality, recognized the public's role during a Wednesday night reception. "It's not enough that citizens be heard, but that they get involved," Connaughton said. The public was not invited to the reception."

EDIT

http://www.heraldtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050610/NEWS/506100592
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. All of the off-shore oil rigs must be taking a toll along with....
...untreated industrial waste dumping into the gulf, untreated coastal community sewage, barge dumping of community garbage and major polluted rivers flowing directly into the gulf. Then all of this mixes with the Caribbean Sea and flows right into the Atlantic Gulf Stream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Anyone who checks this thread should read "City on Fire"
about the Texas City disaster in the late 40's. For anyone who's never been to the Gulf Coast, this will be an eye-opener about what goes on in the region.

It makes you think the next Bhopal could occur in the area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musette_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. well, it's about Texas and Florida!
Of COURSE it's "behind closed doors"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Gulf was noticeably polluted back in the 70s.
I'm sure its much, much worse now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funflower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Will any changes to the Gulf Stream exacerbate this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It might.
As usual, I'm wading out of my depth here, but I assume that the gulf stream acts like a river, continually flushing the gulf of accumulating pollution. If it were to malfunction, all the crap we're dumping into the gulf might accumulate to even higher concentrations, without a mechanism to remove them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Probably not at all
The Gulf Stream is largely isolated from the Gulf of Mexico in spite of the shared names. The Carribean island chain forms a natural barrier that inhibits "communication" of the waters. That doesn't mean that there is NO communication, but it's not a natural flow-through area. The Gulf of Mexico is its own ocean basin. The same tectonic forces that made the Gulf such a rich oil area also turned it into a relatively isolated basin.

The type of pollution also determines how it is cleared. Petrochemical pollution is actually fairly biodegradable. If all oil producing activity stopped right now, within 100 years the Gulf would be just about pristine. But manufactured objects tend to last longer, even plastics, which biodegrade, but much slower.

I tend to suspect that this closed-door meeting is about a lot of things other than just pollution. The way the Bush administration operates, I would not be surprised if they found Atlantis and are gerrymandering the Atlanteans to extract the most electoral votes.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. Don't forget the nitrogen and phosphorus run-off from the midwest
farms coming in from the Mississippi. Together with all the nitrogen and phosphorus laden treated sewage coming from all the midwest cities. All of this creates the biological oxygen demand that leaves the dead zone in the Gulf in the summer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. That is probably the main problem
Such run off is the problem in the Chesapeake, but to correct the problem you have to crack down on farmers along the Mississippi and Missouri rivers, all good Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amazona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. yeah, I think it's the damn run-off
The rigs have good and bad aspects but the run-off is just all bad for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC