Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NRG Energy Cuts Capital Spending On Texas Nuclear Power Project

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 01:08 PM
Original message
NRG Energy Cuts Capital Spending On Texas Nuclear Power Project
http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20100802-707350.html

NRG Energy Inc. (NRG) is slashing spending on two new reactors planned at an existing power plant in Texas as it awaits a decision from the federal government on a loan guarantee for the multibillion-dollar project.

The Princeton, N.J., independent power producer is the second nuclear developer to cut spending on a nuclear project in the last week. Constellation Energy Group Inc. (CEG) announced Wednesday it would reduce spending on a new reactor planned for a nuclear-power plant in Maryland and could completely shut it down by the end of the year if it hadn't received a federal guarantee.

Government support has become a crucial early step for power companies looking to build the first new U.S. reactors in a generation, since federal guarantees would give lenders the confidence to finance the lengthy and expensive projects. The U.S. Department of Energy awarded Southern Co. (SO) a roughly $8 billion guarantee in February for a project in Georgia. Since then, NRG Energy, Constellation and Scana Corp. (SCG) have been competing for the remaining guarantee available under the federal program.

NRG said Monday it would reduce spending on the project to $1.5 million a month. That's down from $7.5 million a month in July and 95% below spending levels in June. NRG's total capital spending on the project for the year is being cut to $186 million from $302 million, the company said during a conference call.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nuclear power is not economically viable.
The risk of default is estimated to be between 50-70%, so, no loan guarantee, no financing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC