Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2004 Hurricane Totals $22 Billion - Insurers Concerned By 2005 Potential

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 08:46 AM
Original message
2004 Hurricane Totals $22 Billion - Insurers Concerned By 2005 Potential
NEW YORK - Hurricanes could cost insurers "above average" losses in 2005, after an unprecedented number of such storms in 2004 made it the industry's costliest year ever, EQECAT Inc., a consulting firm that tracks natural disaster costs, said Wednesday.

"Although the current season might not be as severe and unusual as the 2004 season, the potential for large losses in 2005 is likely to be troubling to insurers and reinsurers, which will have to cover the potential hurricane damage claims," said Tom Larsen, senior vice president of EQECAT.

Last year, total insured losses in the United States topped $22 billion after six hurricanes made landfall, causing 59 deaths, according to the Insurance Information Institute.

EQECAT, which has 50 years of hurricane data, said there is more than a 1-in-3 chance of large hurricane catastrophe losses in the United States in the current season. The consulting firm's outlook is based on current forecasts by the National Hurricane Center (NHC) which has suggested 2005 is likely to be an "above average" year."

EDIT

http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/31258/story.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Those poor embattled insurance companies!
My heart just bleeds for their losses! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Unfortunately your wallet is going to bleed, too
We'll all end up paying for their losses through raised insurance premiums around the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I wish I could run a casino like that ...
... where you can charge the punters to bet on all sorts of things,
usually winning (thus keeping the money to spend on yourself) but on
the occasions where you lose, you simply organise a whip-round from
all the people in the building (so that you can still spend the same
amount on yourself)!

I'm in the wrong business ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Political junkie comments
Insurance companies always (ALWAYS) "Privatize" profit and "Socialize" Risk.

In CA - after Northridge and Loma Prieta - the private carrier moved out of earthquake en masse and practically simultaneously. Just like flood insurance, just like tornado insurance (in some states), just like medical malpractice insurance (in some states), just like aircraft "hull insurance" (partially after 9/11), and Price-Anderson in the nuclear industry.

It is irrelevant whether the losses are investment loses or underwriting losses. --"Privatize" profit and "Socialize" Risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. Volunteer Emergency Responder Comments
Edited on Fri Jun-17-05 08:39 AM by Coastie for Truth
It's going to be worse this year - because while we have the Red Cross and the Salvation Army and and the Southern Baptists Mass Feeding etc.---

15% of fire fighters, police, and public employee paramedics are Reservists and Guardsmen ....., plus the Guard is mobilized for military misadventures in Iraq. That's the paid inner corps around which the Red Cross and the Salvation Army and and the Southern Baptists Mass Feeding and FEMA mobilize. So, the damage mitigation capability will again be seriously compromised.

(For last summer's hurricanes, Florida had to pay other states to borrow their State Guard units --and the Red Cross and Salvation Army were scraping their more geriatric volunteers -- I was there and I am safely "semi"-retires, not a young kid anymore).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. This national-guard thing is going to bite us.
Our ability to respond to a domestic disaster is crippled. Earthquakes, hurricanes, bird-flu, it doesn't really matter. Anything big enough to swamp the local authorities usually requires the national guard, and they aren't available.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. When the NGO Emergency Responders
Like the Red Cross, Salvation Army, Southern Baptist Mass feeding, Coast Guard Auxiliary, Civil Air Patrol and CERT/Citizens' Corps are calling up the geriatrics at the bottom of the volunteer barrel (like me) - we got problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Throckmorton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. I live 500 feet from long island sound,
Since 1994 my homeowners insurance has gone for $300 per year to over $700 dollars per year, in addition to that, my wind damage coverage now has a $5000 deductable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I live between the San Andreas and Hayward/Calaveras Faults
and my Earthquake Insurance (California Earthquake Authority) is more then my Condo "Homeowners" and "Peronal Liability Umbrella" combined.

The Earthquake Insurance has a big deductible - I basically buy it for the "Temporary Lodging" coverage - live in a post-Loma Prieta building so I think will survive structurally intact abd inhabitable "shortly" after the shaking stops. But I do expect to have clean up damages - and to be without electricity or water (including sewage) for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC