Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US electrical generation - Where we are now

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 12:06 PM
Original message
US electrical generation - Where we are now
Figure 8 is a little calculation I made, trying to figure out the cost of capacity on more of a comparable basis, adjusting for utilization.

In Figure 8, the nominal costs per 1,000 watts of capacity are my estimates regarding what the FERC amounts shown in Figure 7 are, underlying the graph amounts. The percentage of capacity is the average of the last four years of the actual percentage of summer capacity, from Figure 5 or 6. The adjusted cost of comparable capacity shown in the last two columns is simply the nominal capacity divided by the utilization.

One can argue whether these numbers are comparable, even after adjustment. For one thing, there are differences in the quality of electricity produced--whether it is available on demand, or not. There are also differences in how many years plants can be expected to operate, operating costs, and the cost of fuel.

On this basis, wind comes out comparable in cost to nuclear, but without the cost of nuclear fuel. Coal and natural gas seem to be quite a bit cheaper (neglecting the considerable cost of fuel). Geothermal seems to be especially cost effective when one considers the lack of fuel costs.

I have added a line for Solar PV, based on the indications of this study from Berkeley regarding the installed cost of solar PV. The numbers are so high that one wonders whether something is wrong with the calculation.

http://www.theoildrum.com/node/6935

"Figure 8"


"Figure 7"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. More data trimming from the nuclear fans...
Edited on Thu Sep-09-10 02:17 PM by kristopher
“MOST LIKELY” SCENARIO
Projected Total Generation Cost/kWh of New Nuclear Power
(In Nominal Dollars in Projected 2018 First Year of Full Operation)
COST COMPONENT $/KWH
CAPITAL COST $0.22
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE W/O FUEL $0.01
PROPERTY TAXES $0.02
DECOMMISSIONING & WASTE COSTS RESERVE $0.02
FUEL CYCLE COSTS $0.03
TOTAL DOLLARS/KWH $0.30


Above is the "most likely" scenario from Severence's analysis of TOTAL cost of delivered electricity from nuclear.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=115x236298
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billlll Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. ALL uranium back in the ground
Nuke power = nuclear war

Somewhere it will start

Pakistan

India

Iran

Israel

N Korea

ALL U. back in the ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billlll Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. PS Experts pls give us simple stat including gov subsidies to all types
And compare to cost now in

CENTS per KWH...six?

Also show municipalized 22% cheaper
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. "Federal Financial Interventions and Subsidies in Energy Markets" (DoE/EIA)
http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/servicerpt/subsidy2/index.html">Federal Financial Interventions and Subsidies in Energy Markets

Here's what you probably want, the table of subsidies and support in cost per unit of production:

http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/servicerpt/subsidy2/pdf/execsum.pdf">Summary -- see page 6, Table ES5. Subsidies and Support to Electricity Production: Alternative Measures

The EIA's results are in dollars per megawatt-hour. For cents per kilowatt-hour, divide by 1000.

This is a three-year-old report, but the trends from 1999 to 2007 have been sharply increased.

--d!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Note that none of the dangerous fossil fuel projections include the costs of disposal
of dangerous fossil fuel waste for eternity.

For that matter, neither do the solar projections include disposal of dangerous solar waste for eternity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC