Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

China Commences Construction on Ningde 4 Nuclear Power Plant.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 08:59 PM
Original message
China Commences Construction on Ningde 4 Nuclear Power Plant.


Main construction work began on the Ningde 4 nuclear power reactor last week, while milestones were reached at two other reactors under construction.

Work on the nuclear island at Nindge 4 officially began on 29 September at a ceremony attended by project partners China Guangdong Nuclear Power Co. and Datang International. The 1080 MWe CPR-1000 reactor is being constructed by China Guangdong Nuclear Power Engineering Corporation and CNI Huaxing Construction. About 85% of the reactor's parts should come from Chinese suppliers, up from 75% for units 1 and 2. The steam turbines and generator set is coming from Dongfang Electric and will use Alstom's Arabelle half-speed technology. The French firm was recently subcontracted by Dongfang for this.

The first phase of development at Ningde nuclear power plant is now fully underway, with four reactors at various stages of construction. Unit 1 is set to begin operation at the end of 2012, construction having begun in February 2008. The cost of the units is set at a grand total of only CNY 52 billion ($7.6 billion), although at least two more CPR-1000s are planned in a second phase of building...




http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NN_Ningde_4_the_latest_Chinese_reactor_project_04101001.html">Ningde 4 construction begins.

The new reactor is rated at 1000 MWe, which means that it would need to operate at 69% capacity utilization to produce as much energy as all the wind turbines in Denmark, something it is relatively easy for nuclear reactors to do, since they generally operate at close to 90% capacity utilization.

The number of reactors in China now under construction remains at 24, since one newly completed reactor received its commercial license last week and is no longer "under construction."

In the next 5 years, China plans a total investment in nuclear energy of about $120 billion US in nuclear power, an amount which is actually greater than their total annual military budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FunkyLeprechaun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-10 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. My husband worked on this
It's neat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-10 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's interesting. What did he do on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FunkyLeprechaun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-10 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. He worked on the generators
He is no longer affiliated with the company and now works for a different engineering company but he worked on this Chinese project for almost 5 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-10 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Cool. I'm glad that US business is working on generators for these plants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FunkyLeprechaun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 05:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. No, it was a British company
Sorry about that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-10 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. Imagine if the USA spent $750 billion over 5 years on nuclear power...
Edited on Tue Oct-05-10 10:49 AM by GliderGuider
You might actually be able to take more than a few coal plants out of service early.

That $750 billion would equal China's planned expenditures in relation to its military budget...

That $750 billion would buy about 150,000 MWe of nuclear capacity for an actual generating ability of about 1200 TWh per year at 90% capacity. That's almost 1/3 of the total electricity generated in the USA last year.

As far as I can tell, that $750 billion would buy almost exactly the same amount of actual electricity produced by wind power.

So the argument (as always) really comes down to things like land usage, intermittency vs. base load, granularity of installation, Industrial capacity and build-out times, and the question of public acceptability (perceived risk vs. perceived aesthetic disruption). All of these except the public acceptability factors can be dealt with objectively...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-10 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Nah, we'll spend it on Afghanistan, banksters and tax cuts
and maybe even Pakistan! :woohoo:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-10 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Probably. The sad thing is, that's only 1% of your GDP.
Edited on Tue Oct-05-10 10:47 AM by GliderGuider
To essentially wipe coal-fired electricity generation off the map in 5 years.

As in all human problems, the real obstacles are not objective...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. So true ...
> As in all human problems, the real obstacles are not objective...

That applies right across the board doesn't it?

:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Or more effectively...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Hey, that looks so keen!
Enjoy yourself, impress your friends and neighbours while saving western civilization at home in your spare time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. When in doubt, test the line between what is polite and what is not...eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. What goes around comes around, I'm afraid.
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 01:50 PM by GliderGuider
I normally try to be polite, but yes, sometimes my baser instincts run away with me. There are lots of ways of being impolite, so I'll try and pick a more polite way next time the urge hits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC