Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Globe & Mail - Sec. Clinton Signals Green Light For Tar Sands Pipeline To U.S.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-10 12:39 PM
Original message
Globe & Mail - Sec. Clinton Signals Green Light For Tar Sands Pipeline To U.S.
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has sent the first signals to Alberta's oil sands producers that the Obama administration is set to green-light a pipeline delivering more of its crude, saying that Canada's “dirty oil” is a better alternative for the United States than the Persian Gulf's.

In remarks that went largely unnoticed until Wednesday, the U.S. secretary of state told the Commonwealth Club of San Francisco late last week that TransCanada Corp.’s (TRP-T39.060.210.54%) Keystone XL pipeline will likely be approved by the U.S. State Department.

The proposal for the pipeline is currently being reviewed by the State Department following cajoling by Democratic legislators, environmentalists and the Environmental Protection Agency in the aftermath of the Gulf of Mexico oil disaster earlier this year. “We haven't finished all of the analysis, so as I say, we've not yet signed off on it,” Ms. Clinton said in response to a question from the audience at the event on Friday.

“But we are inclined to do so and we are for several reasons ... we're either going to be dependent on dirty oil from the Gulf or dirty oil from Canada.” Tolerating dirty oil, she added, is a reality “until we can get our act together as a country and figure out that clean, renewable energy is in both our economic interests and the interests of our planet.”

EDIT

Ed. - Emphasis added - and when would that be?

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/us-set-to-approve-keystone-xl-pipeline/article1765920/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-10 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Horrible. Absolutely horrible.
Canada tar sands are much worse than oil from other sources. The environmental damage is catastrophic. We can't undo the damage once it has been done. The answer is to use much LESS oil, not dirtier oil. This is out of step with the much more positive action the administration has been taking.

http://www.tarsandswatch.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. Funny how "Change" smells just like oil ... (n/t)
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC