No shit, Senator.
EDIT
Politics is not far from the calculation, either. Graham shrugged off the notion that he might feel a conservative backlash in 2014, when he's up for re-election, by pushing forward with an agenda that counts clean air as a central objective. "I'm concerned that if the Republican Party doesn't embrace the idea
it's OK to clean up the air, we're gonna lose young people forever," Graham told ClimateWire. "Whether you like it or not, young people are environmentally sensitive. I happen to like it."
"So the Republican Party has to find out where are we at on carbon? The more, the better, or is it something we should control in a business-friendly manner?" he added. "I'm in the camp that all things being equal, that it would be good to clean up the air, carbon being just one pollutant. But I want to do it in a way that creates jobs, not loses jobs."
EDIT
But a clean energy standard is "a good agenda item" for conservatives, said Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), a key supporter of incoming tea party lawmakers. "I think a conversion to nuclear makes a whole lotta long-term economic sense," he said. "And it's certainly good for the environment. So it doesn't make a whole lotta sense to come up some elaborate cap-and-trade scheme."
DeMint, however, never mentioned renewable energy in a brief interview and provided a clear warning about government intrusion on the energy markets: "We just want to do it within some reasonable cost-benefit parameters, and not keep picking winners and losers with subsidies."
EDIT
http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2010/12/14/14climatewire-one-republican-unhappy-with-his-partys-posit-93728.html