Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Solar Power to Cut Colossal Cruise Ship Emissions!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 12:01 PM
Original message
Solar Power to Cut Colossal Cruise Ship Emissions!
Edited on Thu Dec-23-10 12:01 PM by wtmusic
Have you ever felt a twinge of enviro-guilt while on a 3-week cruise to the Bahamas? I hate that feeling! But now we can cruise with a clear conscience:

Good news out of Los Angeles, where the completion of a 1-megawatt (MW) solar power system covering 71,500 square feet will now allow ships docked between cruises to access some 1.2 million kilowatt-hours of clean, renewable solar power instead of using their diesel generators for shore-side energy needs.


This news means your trip's CO2 emissions will be slashed by a whopping .04%, (if your trip only made port in Los Angeles on sunny days). It doesn't take a genius to see that cruise ships, with their annual emissions of 5.4 trillion tons of CO2, will now be eco-friendly - with annual emissions of 5.396 trillion tons, or thereabouts.

Here's a ship equipped with solar panels, which on sunny days provide more than enough juice to power the ship's radio:



http://theenergycollective.com/taylenpeterson/48894/solar-power-cut-colossal-cruise-ship-emissions?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=The+Energy+Collective+%28all+posts%29
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Every little bit helps!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Got that right, .1%
I was afraid I was going to have to give up cruises, but with this and recycling grocery bags, I'm an eco-warrior!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-10 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yuppie brat ecofrauds are preventing nuclear powered cruise ships
Edited on Fri Dec-24-10 09:23 PM by Kolesar
:mockery:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Mockery from dumb guys is the sincerest form of flattery.
There is NOT ONE dumb anti-nuke who gives a rat's ass about all of the diesel engines at sea, which is responsible for something like 10% of the planet's air pollution.

The reason is that EVERY anti-nuke without exception would rather cause the death of http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs313/en/index.html">2 million people each year
rather than face the easily demonstrable FACT that their fear mongering fantasies about nuclear energy are, well, fear mongering fantasies.

Nuclear energy need not be perfect to be better than all the stuff that fear mongering mindless anti-nukes don't care about, and, in fact, <em>everything</em> else.

It only has to be better than everything else, which it is.

Have a nice cruise ship mentality consumerist evening of despising the science of Glenn Seaborg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lfairban Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-10 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. How about this?
What about a WIND powered cruise ship? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-25-10 04:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. There was actually a novel idea to use kites to pull cruise ships along, it was never explored.


Just concept stuff as far as I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lfairban Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-25-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Oh, sorry. I forgot my
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-25-10 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yeah, I know you were being sarcastic, but I really liked the jet stream kite idea.
Use nanotubes and carbon fabric based kites to pull large ships along the tropic of capicorn, etc.

Unfortunately the renewable solution invariably has fantasy talk backing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Gaining in popularity


"Climb aboard one of these majestic sailing ships and set sail to exotic locations. Experience life at sea up close, on vessels ranging in size from 6 passenger Schooners to 300 passenger Tall Ships."

http://www.sailingshipadventures.com/

Comparable in price, but no casino or floor show. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. I like that! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. Maybe just a drop in the bucket, but the best news is that they won't be spewing
emissions into the air while in the harbor. And that's good for everybody in the LA area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. That is a very good point. Location can make all the difference...
...to an otherwise pointless seeming exercise. Although the option has always existed to plug into the grid while docked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Ports are already cracking down on secondary emissions, which is good, of course.
But CO2 is the most impactful of them all. Indeed, aerosol emissions contribute to dimming... it's actually a lose-lose, by lowering aerosol emissions and turning a blind eye to CO2 emissions, what states are doing is just perpetuating the biggest problem our environment has ever faced.

But that's how they work, pick at the tiniest little thing and make it out to be significant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC